试述CMI运输法草案下的诉权制度
[Abstract]:International carriage of goods by sea is one of the main transport modes in the world today. According to statistics, more than 90% of the goods are transported by sea to realize goods trade at different places. The developed maritime market demands the global unification of the law on the carriage of goods by sea, so as to reduce or avoid the problems arising from the inconsistency of the law, such as choice of prosecution, unfair competition, and increased commercial costs. However, the present situation is that, owing to the historical reasons, there are three major international conventions, namely The Hague Rules, the Hague-Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, and there is still a difference between the three international conventions; The absence of a State which has acceded to the Convention is regulated by the respective legislation of the carriage of goods by sea, which makes the international carriage of goods by sea quite confusing and is not conducive to the development of international maritime transport. In order to unify the law on the carriage of goods by sea, the International Maritime Commission (CMI), 1999, was commissioned by the United Nations Commission on Trade Law to establish the Transport Law Sub-Commission, On 28 September 2000, the Draft Framework Document for Transport Law was drafted (Draft Outline Instrument) (hereinafter referred to as the draft Transport Law). The draft transport law was revised two times in February 2001 and May 2001 respectively, and the final draft has 17 chapters, the system is relatively complete, the content of the articles is relatively perfect, and the control of the goods is increased, and the transfer, limitation and general average of the rights under the transport document can be transferred. Other conventions, restrictions on freedom of contract, etc. It is worth noting that chapter 13 of the draft law on transport has made special provisions on the issue of confidentiality under the contract of carriage. This issue has always been a complicated problem in maritime law and even the whole procedure law. At present, our country's" maritime law "does not stipulate clearly, and the cognition in judicial practice is not uniform. The author tries to start with the basic theory of the theory of law, and in the framework of the draft transportation law, combine the provisions of relevant laws and the achievements of judicial practice at home and abroad, and make some research and discussion on the problem of human rights, with a view to achieving the purpose of deepening the understanding of the problem. The thesis consists of foreword, positive, The text, the conclusion is mostly. The foreword is the first part of the thesis. In the foreword, the main media The historical background of the draft CMI transport law has been introduced. At present, three conventions exist in the international standard for the regulation of the carriage of goods by sea. The Hague Rules, the Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules are not the Hague Rules. In order to unify the existing international shipping regulations, the United Nations Law Commission on Trade has commissioned The International Maritime Commission has drafted a new international transport law, which summarizes the previous international conventions and States The experience of legislation reflects a new trend in international legislation. In the draft, many new elements have been added, such as for in accordance with the provisions of the present invention, This is also the focus of this study. The text is divided into three chapters. The chapter mainly discusses the concept and meaning of existentialism. The Analysis of CMI Transportation Law from the Theoretical Production and History of the Theory of Science and Technology The Legal System under the Draft From the point of view of development, the theory of national salvation has been carried out. Compare and try again This paper deals with the concept of science and commerce under the maritime law. The chapter mainly discusses when The problem of a person's fitness. The process of action is the lawsuit between the plaintiff and the defendant. co-thrust of behavior Dynamic. This is whether the plaintiff and the defendant have legal qualification as the legal representative On the Premise of Maritime Law so that the identification problem of the original and the defendant becomes It's complicated. This chapter goes deep into the identification of the original and defendant. Ground analysis. In the third chapter, the author gives a detailed description of the way of transfer. The draft of the draft law provides for four types of goods. Transferor type, pen The author gives a comprehensive introduction to the transfer of electronic records. The prosecution and breach of tort in maritime law are discussed. The tort and default are two. non-identical Disputes arising from the carriage of goods by sea often arise. The author thinks about two kinds of
【学位授予单位】:上海海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2003
【分类号】:D99;D922.294
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王胜伟,喻煌,胡f;我国鉴定人制度研究[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2004年04期
2 吴建农;民事诉讼代理制度研究[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年02期
3 余忠萍,李辉;论反致制度[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年06期
4 田晓云;区际冲突法与我国区际法律冲突的解决[J];北方工业大学学报;1999年04期
5 赵相林,邢钢;论国际民事诉讼中的挑选法院[J];比较法研究;2002年02期
6 郭树理;《海牙民商事司法文书与司法外文书域外送达公约》述评[J];比较法研究;2002年02期
7 童兆洪,林翔荣;民事执行救济制度刍论[J];比较法研究;2002年03期
8 熊跃敏;诉讼上和解的比较研究[J];比较法研究;2003年02期
9 金振豹;论国际私法上识别冲突的解决[J];比较法研究;2003年03期
10 杜新丽;网络时代冲突法理论与规则的几点思考[J];比较法研究;2003年05期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 徐伟功;黄鹏;;美国区际民事案件移送制度研究[A];2006年中国青年国际法学者暨博士生论坛论文集(国际私法卷)[C];2006年
2 杜焕芳;;涉外民商事案件管辖权实证研究——一个以司法为中心的考察[A];2006年中国青年国际法学者暨博士生论坛论文集(国际私法卷)[C];2006年
3 欧福永;;越南民商事管辖权制度探析[A];2006年中国青年国际法学者暨博士生论坛论文集(国际私法卷)[C];2006年
4 乔雄兵;;国际民事诉讼中的惩罚性损害赔偿制度比较研究[A];2006年中国青年国际法学者暨博士生论坛论文集(国际私法卷)[C];2006年
5 杜涛;;互惠原则与外国法院判决的承认与执行[A];2006年中国青年国际法学者暨博士生论坛论文集(国际私法卷)[C];2006年
6 李发嘉;;进口押汇及其信托收据的有关法律问题探讨[A];第三届中国律师论坛论文集(实务卷)[C];2003年
7 蒋五四;梁燕玲;;如何理解《民事诉讼法》第268条规定的互惠原则[A];中国律师2004年海商法研讨会暨中华全国律师协会海商海事专业委员会年会论文集[C];2004年
8 周勇;;论民事附带行政诉讼和行政附带民事诉讼的审判方式改革与诉权保护原则[A];第四届中国律师论坛百篇优秀论文集[C];2004年
9 邬先江;;再论外国法查明[A];2007年海商法国际研讨会论文集[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王生长;仲裁与调解相结合制度研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2001年
2 蔡长林;民事诉讼程序公正之研究[D];中国政法大学;2001年
3 陈东;论跨国公司治理中的责任承担机制[D];厦门大学;2001年
4 葛明珍;论权利冲突[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2002年
5 史飚;商事仲裁监督与制约机制研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年
6 徐胜萍;民事诉讼简易程序研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年
7 吴杰;民事诉讼证明标准之基础理论研究[D];西南政法大学;2003年
8 周孟炎;民事审判程序研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
9 侯登华;仲裁协议制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
10 寇丽;现代国际商事仲裁法律适用问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李军;提单仲裁条款效力若干问题的研究[D];上海海运学院;2000年
2 向新柱;中国大陆与香港两地专利法比较研究[D];华中师范大学;2001年
3 吴群;论商标审查制度[D];对外经济贸易大学;2001年
4 张烨;关于拖延仲裁程序的法律思考[D];对外经济贸易大学;2001年
5 石慧;论经济全球化下对国际税收竞争的法律规范[D];湘潭大学;2001年
6 刘云;我国法官制度改革:动因、目标与实现方式[D];湘潭大学;2001年
7 陈晶;国际商事仲裁程序法律适用研究[D];中国政法大学;2001年
8 胡秋明;论审前程序[D];中国政法大学;2001年
9 黄台英;关于中国合同法的违约体系之研究[D];中国政法大学;2001年
10 李盈;论反垄断法的国际冲突与协调[D];中国政法大学;2001年
本文编号:2276608
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2276608.html