货物买卖合同与货物海运合同衔接问题研究

发布时间：2018-10-20 09:02

【摘要】：国际货物买卖中，，货物需要进行跨越国境的运输，完成从卖方到买方的地理位置转移。海上运输是最重要的运输方式。由于国际买卖合同与国际海上货物运输合同分别受买卖法与运输法调整，而国际、国内、有关买卖、运输的立法并不同步，导致作为前端的买卖合同与作为后端的运输合同不能有效衔接，极大阻碍了国际货物买卖合同的顺利履行。本文作者以国际货物买卖和国际海上货物运输的国际立法、国际惯例及中国法律为立足点，比较买卖法与运输法在损害赔偿范围、买方提货义务等方面规定的异同，对买卖合同与运输合同的有效衔接提出自己的观点。本文第一章对FOB、CIF买卖合同与运输合同在租船订舱、装卸费率、THC支付方面的衔接问题进行了探讨。本文第二章通过比较买卖法与运输法在“货物控制权”方面规定的异同，对我国《海商法》增加控制权内容提出修改建议。对买卖合同与运输合同在控制权方面的衔接提出自己的观点。本文第三章通过比较买卖法与运输法在“货物损害赔偿范围”方面规定的异同，对我国《海商法》中“货物损害赔偿范围”提出修改建议。对买卖合同与运输合同在“货物损害赔偿范围”方面衔接提出自己的观点。本文第四章通过比较买卖法与运输法在“买方提货义务”方面规定的异同，对我国《海商法》中“买方提货义务”的相关问题提出修改建议。本文第五章着重探讨UNCITRAL运输法草案中承运人责任期间的扩展、无单放货的新规定可能对买卖合同产生的影响。
[Abstract]:In the international sale and purchase of goods, the goods need to be transported across the border to complete the geographical transfer from the seller to the buyer. Maritime transport is the most important mode of transport. Because the international contract of sale and the contract of international carriage of goods by sea are respectively regulated by the law of sale and the law of carriage, the international, domestic, relevant legislation on sale and transportation is not synchronized. As a result, the front-end sale contract and the back-end transport contract can not be effectively linked, which greatly hinders the smooth performance of the international goods sale contract. Based on the international legislation, international practice and Chinese law of the international sale of goods and the international carriage of goods by sea, the author compares the similarities and differences between the law of sale and the law of carriage in the scope of damages, the obligation of the buyer to pick up goods, and so on. Put forward one's own viewpoint on the effective connection between the contract of sale and the contract of carriage. In the first chapter, the connection between FOB,CIF contract and transportation contract in chartering, loading and unloading rate and THC payment is discussed. In the second chapter, by comparing the similarities and differences between the law of sale and the law of transport in the aspect of "right of control of goods", the author puts forward some suggestions for the amendment of the content of increasing the right of control in Maritime Law of our country. To the contract of sale and purchase and the contract of carriage in the right of control to put forward their own point of view. In the third chapter, by comparing the similarities and differences in the scope of damages for goods between the law of sale and the law of carriage, the author puts forward some suggestions to amend the scope of compensation for damages of goods in Maritime Law of China. The author puts forward his own views on the connection between the contract of sale and the contract of carriage in the scope of damages for goods. In the fourth chapter, by comparing the similarities and differences between the law of sale and the law of carriage in the aspect of "buyer's obligation to pick up goods", the author puts forward some suggestions on the amendment of "buyer's obligation to pick up goods" in China's Maritime Law. The fifth chapter focuses on the extension of the carrier's liability period in the draft of UNCITRAL Transport Law, and the possible impact of the new provisions on the contract of sale and purchase.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】