非国家工作人员受贿罪研究

发布时间：2019-03-22 09:37

【摘要】：随着我国市场经济的发展,原来主要集中于公权力领域内的贿赂行为开始向非公权力领域蔓延,出现了一些公司、企业或者其他单位的非国家工作人员利用职务上的便利,索取或收受他人贿赂,为他人谋利益的现象,严重损害了市场经济运行所需的公平竞争秩序,应当对此进行刑法的规制。非国家工作人员受贿罪是现行刑法对此现象进行规制的有力武器。但是对非国家工作人员受贿罪的理解和认识在刑法理论上和司法实务中还存在一些分歧、争议,本文从本罪的立法沿革入手,围绕争议问题,对本罪的概念、罪名、构成要件及法定刑完善等方面展开了重点论述,并就司法实务中可能牵涉本罪的一起案件的处理进行了探讨。本文分为七个部分。第一部分,探索了我国立法中非国家工作人员受贿罪演进的历史脉络。指出有关本罪的立法变迁实际上反映了市场经济下公司、企业及其他单位等市场主体的独立地位不断被重视、被承认的过程。同时,通过对不同观点的分析,认为非国家工作人员受贿罪的罪名较好地把握了本罪的特征和本质,指出对本罪概念的定义要对相关法条进行全面把握以便使其更符合本罪的立法原意。第二部分,通过对诸学说分析,认为非国家工作人员受贿罪的客体应该是非国家工作人员职务行为的不可收买性和职务行为的公正性之复合客体。如果单指职务行为的不可收买性则扩大了本罪的入罪范围,如果单指职务行为的公正性则容易产生歧义。第三部分,指出非国家工作人员受贿罪名下的“利用职务之便”只能是利用本人职务上主管、负责某项公司、企业、单位事务的职权或具有隶属和制约关系的其他工作人员职务上的行为。在行为方式上,无论是索贿型受贿还是收受型受贿均需具备为他人谋取利益的要件。对于贿赂的范围,本文认为从应然的角度出发,贿赂的范围应该界定为利益更为恰当。而本罪中的“为他人谋取利益”应限定为实际上为他人谋取了利益。第四部分,指出是否从事公务是区分国家工作人员与非国家工作人员的关键,但并非所有的非国家工作人员都可以构成本罪的主体,还必须具有从事职务行为的特征,即从事的是职责所规定的具有管理权的工作。对“其他单位的工作人员”的几种类型进行了列举分析。反思了我国刑法关于本罪主体范围规定的不合理性,认为应该将非单位工作人员也包括在本罪主体范围内。第五部分,认为本罪的主观罪过方面既可以是直接故意,也可以是间接故意。在事后受贿的场合,不管事先有无约定,只要事后行为人明知是对职权行为的不正当报酬而予以接受,就应构成本罪。第六部分,对本罪的法定刑及其完善进行了探讨,指出可以考虑建立以数额和情节相结合的定罪量刑标准、完善财产刑、增设剥夺从事特定职业的资格刑。第七部分,对中国足球联赛中的“黑哨”行为的定性进行了分析,指出龚建平案应在司法能动与罪刑法定原则中寻找平衡,在当时刑法还没有将“其他单位的工作人员”纳入第163条规定之主体时,将黑哨行为定性为公司、企业人员受贿罪是不合适的,指出受贿罪的定性在司法能动与罪刑法定原则中较好的寻求了平衡。
[Abstract]:With the development of the market economy in our country, the bribery in the field of public power has been mainly concentrated in the field of non-public power, and some companies, enterprises or other units of non-State functionaries take advantage of their functions to obtain or accept bribes from others. In order to gain the interests of others, the fair competition order needed for the operation of the market economy is seriously damaged, and the criminal law should be regulated. The bribery of non-State staff is a powerful weapon in the current criminal law to regulate the phenomenon. But the understanding and understanding of the bribery crime of non-state staff also have some differences and disputes in the theory of criminal law and in the judicial practice. The paper mainly discusses the elements of the constitution and the improvement of the legal penalty, and probes into the handling of a case that may involve the crime in the judicial practice. This paper is divided into seven parts. The first part explores the history of the evolution of the bribery crime of the staff of the Central African countries in our country The article points out that the legislative changes related to the crime actually reflect the independent status of the market subjects such as the company, the enterprise and other units in the market economy, and is recognized At the same time, through the analysis of different opinions, it is considered that the crime of the non-state staff is better grasped the character and essence of the crime, and points out that the definition of the concept of the crime should be fully grasped in order to make it more consistent with the legislation of this crime. The second part, through the analysis of the theories, thinks that the object of the bribery crime of non-State functionaries should be the non-buy-off of the duty of non-State functionaries and the impartiality of job behavior The object of the compound is to enlarge the scope of the crime of the crime if the unbridled nature of the job behavior of a single finger, if the impartiality of the one-finger job behavior is the same, In the third part, it is pointed out that the "to take advantage of the position of the job" in the name of the bribery crime of non-State staff can only be used by the supervisor in his position, and is responsible for the functions of the company, the enterprise, the unit affairs, or other work with the membership and the restriction relationship The act of a person's position. In the form of conduct, both the type of bribery and the acceptance of a bribe need to be provided for him. In the view of the scope of the bribery, the article is of the view that the scope of the bribery should be the boundary from the point of view. The "to gain a profit for others" of this crime should be limited to the fact that the interests are more appropriate. In the fourth part, it was pointed out whether to engage in public service was the key to the distinction between national and non-State staff, but not all non-State staff could form the subject of the crime and must Having the characteristics of doing the job, that is, the duty to carry on. Having the right to manage. For "Staff of other units". Some types have been enumerated and analyzed. The non-rationality of the criminal law of our country on the subject of this crime is reflected, and the non-unit staff should be considered It is also included in the scope of the crime of this crime. The fifth part is that the subjective fault of the crime can both It is either direct or indirect intent. In the event of an ex post-bribery case, whether or not there is a prior agreement, as long as the post-fact agent knows that it is an improper act of authority In the sixth part, the author discusses the legal punishment and the perfection of the crime, and points out that it is possible to consider the establishment of the standard of conviction and sentencing with the combination of the amount and the plot, and to improve the property. In the seventh part, the author analyzes the "blackguard" behavior in the Chinese football league, and points out that the criminal law should find a balance in the legal principle of the judicial action and the crime and punishment. At that time, the criminal law has not included the "Staff of other units" in the first part. Article 63 In the case of a subject, it is not appropriate to qualify the black whistle as a company, and the bribery crime of the enterprise personnel is not appropriate, and it is pointed out that the nature of the bribery crime is
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.392

【相似文献】