专利权保护的司法救济
发布时间：2019-04-01 07:31
【摘要】：专利权保护的司法救济作为专利权司法行政保护双轨制的重要组成部分，在专利权的保护方面发挥了主要的积极作用。本文主要是对专利侵权的归责原则、专利侵权的认定、专利赔偿的判定等理论上模糊、实践上难以把握的问题进行了论述。作者认为，认定专利侵权，，无需看主观过错；判令承担赔偿责任，则要看主观心理。对于侵权判定，要在区分必要技术特征和非必要技术特征的基础上进行增减等同的判断；对外观设计专利，要突出一般标准、普通消费者眼光。在赔偿数额的计算上，要强调合理性原则，把专利权人查明、制止侵权的合理费用计算在内。以此，通过理论上的探讨进一步指导司法实践。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the dual-track system of judicial protection of patent right, the judicial remedy of patent right protection has played a major positive role in the protection of patent right. This paper mainly discusses the principles of imputation of patent infringement, the identification of patent infringement, the judgment of patent compensation, etc., which are vague in theory and difficult to grasp in practice. The author thinks that the determination of patent infringement does not need to look at the subjective fault, and the judgment of liability for compensation depends on the subjective psychology. On the basis of distinguishing necessary technical features from non-essential technical features, we should judge the equivalent of additions and deletions, and give prominence to the general standard and common consumer's vision for the patent of design. In the calculation of the amount of compensation, we should emphasize the principle of reasonableness, and include the reasonable expenses of the patentee to find out and stop the infringement. In this way, through the theoretical discussion to further guide the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：D923.42
本文编号：2451364
[Abstract]:As an important part of the dual-track system of judicial protection of patent right, the judicial remedy of patent right protection has played a major positive role in the protection of patent right. This paper mainly discusses the principles of imputation of patent infringement, the identification of patent infringement, the judgment of patent compensation, etc., which are vague in theory and difficult to grasp in practice. The author thinks that the determination of patent infringement does not need to look at the subjective fault, and the judgment of liability for compensation depends on the subjective psychology. On the basis of distinguishing necessary technical features from non-essential technical features, we should judge the equivalent of additions and deletions, and give prominence to the general standard and common consumer's vision for the patent of design. In the calculation of the amount of compensation, we should emphasize the principle of reasonableness, and include the reasonable expenses of the patentee to find out and stop the infringement. In this way, through the theoretical discussion to further guide the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：D923.42
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘京;专利侵权损害赔偿研究[D];北京化工大学;2010年
本文编号：2451364
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2451364.html
