金融海啸中的三重危机与法律应对
发布时间：2019-04-27 03:32
【摘要】：金融海啸包含了三重危机:次级贷款危机、金融衍生品危机以及金融全球化危机。它们分别处于基础金融环节、金融衍生品市场以及国际金融市场。三种危机之间有联动效应,但可以分别进行分析。相应地,它们对法律提出的挑战也各不相同,涉及国内法、国际法两个层面,覆盖金融监管(公法)与金融商法(私法)两类完全不同的法律领域。法律对金融海啸的回应也应当三条进路并行,包括国际层面的新布雷顿森林体系建设、金融监管立法的改进,以及目前尚为人忽略的金融商法/私法秩序的重构。
[Abstract]:The financial tsunami contains three crises: subprime loan crisis, financial derivatives crisis and financial globalization crisis. They are in the basic financial sector, financial derivatives markets and international financial markets. There are linkage effects among the three crises, but can be analyzed separately. Accordingly, they pose different challenges to the law, involving two levels of domestic law and international law, covering two completely different areas of law: financial regulation (public law) and financial commercial law (private law). The legal response to the financial tsunami should go hand in hand, including the construction of the new Bretton Woods system at the international level, the improvement of the financial regulatory legislation, and the reconstruction of the financial and commercial / private law order, which is still neglected.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.28
[Abstract]:The financial tsunami contains three crises: subprime loan crisis, financial derivatives crisis and financial globalization crisis. They are in the basic financial sector, financial derivatives markets and international financial markets. There are linkage effects among the three crises, but can be analyzed separately. Accordingly, they pose different challenges to the law, involving two levels of domestic law and international law, covering two completely different areas of law: financial regulation (public law) and financial commercial law (private law). The legal response to the financial tsunami should go hand in hand, including the construction of the new Bretton Woods system at the international level, the improvement of the financial regulatory legislation, and the reconstruction of the financial and commercial / private law order, which is still neglected.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.28
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 楼建波;;特定目的营业主体在商法上的地位——兼论商主体的规制原则[J];社会科学;2008年03期
2 史蒂芬.马祖;;信用违约互换:中国债券投资者的机遇[J];中国货币市场;2007年11期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 华国庆,曾虎;商业银行不良资产证券化的法律障碍及对策[J];安徽大学学报;2004年01期
2 刘晓辉,李静;信贷资产证券化的法律思考[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年04期
3 孙超;;论未来应收账款的转让融资[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
4 张培尧;;资产证券化中SPV破产风险隔离法律机制探讨[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
5 韩惠,孙鹤鸣;谈资产证券化中的法律问题[J];商业研究;2003年05期
6 胡志成;我国资产证券化中特殊目的载体采用公司形式的可行性分析[J];商业研究;2005年17期
7 吴植芳;;关于资产证券化几个理论问题的思考[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2006年03期
8 陈e，
本文编号：2466656
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2466656.html
