《鹿特丹规则》之下托运人制度研究
发布时间：2019-05-12 12:02
【摘要】：2008年12月11日，联合国第63届大会第67次会议正式通过了《联合国全程或部分国际海上货物运输公约》，并于2009年9月23日在荷兰鹿特丹举行了签字仪式，将公约定名为《鹿特丹规则》。这部新公约对托运人制度作出了很多重大的变革。以往的三个已经生效的国际海运公约可以说是以承运人为中心的，，重点规定承运人的义务与责任。《鹿特丹规则》一改以往的国际公约中托运人不受重视的状况，对托运人投入了很大的热情和精力。《鹿特丹规则》重新规定了托运人的定义，引入了单证托运人，并且对托运人的权利与义务分别进行了比较详细的规定。本文从托运人出发，比较《鹿特丹规则》与以往三个公约规定的不同，分析《鹿特丹规则》中托运人制度的优劣，最后结合我国海运的实践，对《海商法》的修改提出一定的建议。全文分为引言、正文和结论三个部分。
[Abstract]:At its 67th meeting, on 11 December 2008, the General Assembly of the United Nations formally adopted the United Nations Convention on the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea and held a signing ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, Name the Convention the Rotterdam rules. This new convention has made many major changes to the shipper's system. The three previous international maritime conventions that have entered into force can be said to be carrier-centered, focusing on the obligations and responsibilities of the carrier. The Rotterdam rules change the situation in which shippers are not attached importance to in previous international conventions. Great enthusiasm and energy have been invested in the shipper. The Rotterdam rules redefine the shipper, introduce the documentary shipper, and specify the rights and obligations of the shipper in detail. Starting from the shipper, this paper compares the differences between the Rotterdam rules and the previous three conventions, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the shipper system in the Rotterdam rules, and finally combines the practice of shipping in China. Some suggestions on the amendment of Maritime Law are put forward. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, main body and conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19
本文编号：2475377
[Abstract]:At its 67th meeting, on 11 December 2008, the General Assembly of the United Nations formally adopted the United Nations Convention on the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea and held a signing ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, Name the Convention the Rotterdam rules. This new convention has made many major changes to the shipper's system. The three previous international maritime conventions that have entered into force can be said to be carrier-centered, focusing on the obligations and responsibilities of the carrier. The Rotterdam rules change the situation in which shippers are not attached importance to in previous international conventions. Great enthusiasm and energy have been invested in the shipper. The Rotterdam rules redefine the shipper, introduce the documentary shipper, and specify the rights and obligations of the shipper in detail. Starting from the shipper, this paper compares the differences between the Rotterdam rules and the previous three conventions, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the shipper system in the Rotterdam rules, and finally combines the practice of shipping in China. Some suggestions on the amendment of Maritime Law are put forward. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, main body and conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭萍;朱珂;;从国际海上货物运输公约的变革看船货双方利益的博弈[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
2 汪忠华;;《鹿特丹规则》下托运人义务变化的初探[J];对外经贸实务;2010年02期
3 马得懿;;FOB条件下卖方风险问题研究——以托运人制度为视角[J];法商研究;2008年04期
4 张荣忠;;集装箱运输中的托运人决定权[J];集装箱化;2008年01期
5 姚洪秀,林晖;论我国《海商法》下“托运人”的认定[J];中国海商法年刊;1996年00期
6 李海;关于“提单是物权凭证”的反思──兼论提单的法律性质[J];中国海商法年刊;1996年00期
7 郭春风;论对《中国海商法》托运人定义及其相关条款的修改[J];中国海商法年刊;1998年00期
8 司玉琢,胡正良;我国《海商法》修改的必要性[J];中国海商法年刊;2002年00期
9 袁发强;马之遥;;平衡抑或完善——评《鹿特丹规则》对海运双方当事人权利与义务的规制[J];中国海商法年刊;2009年04期
10 司玉琢;;《鹿特丹规则》的评价与展望[J];中国海商法年刊;2009年Z1期
本文编号：2475377
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2475377.html
