当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 商法论文 >

体育法的概念和范围

发布时间:2019-05-24 18:45
【摘要】: 对“体育”一词的界定是探讨体育法的概念和范围的前提和基础。目前在体育学界,对体育一词的界定并没有一个准确的答案,存在着各种不同的观念,我们应接受体育即“sport”的观念,并且应在对体育作广义的理解,即体育不仅包括身体教育,还包括竞技体育与大众体育。在法学视野下界定体育这一概念亦存在着不同的模式。我国现行的《中华人民共和国体育法》也没有对体育下一个严格的定义,我们认为只有部分体育行为才能进入体育法的视野。法律视野下的体育外延应小于广义的体育概念的外延。体育法是存在的,而且已经是一个独立的法律领域,这有大量的证据可以证明,据此,体育法是国家对体育进行管制的法律规则(如英国的制止足球流氓立法,我国的反兴奋剂立法)和由体育运动的当事人(包括体育行会)自己创造的用以调整他们彼此之间的体育关系的规则的总称。前一类规则具有公力强制性的特点,而后一类规则具有自治性、专业性、以及非公力强制性的特点。 体育法具有自己的特征,第一是多元性,表现为体育法渊源的多元性和效力来源的多元性。第二是国际性,体育的国际性决定了体育法所具有的国际性,国际体育法正在形成。第三是技术性,体育作为一项专门性活动,它的技术性特征决定了体育法的技术性。体育法有自己独特的研究范围,国内体育法教材对体育法范围的界定各不相同,但基本上围绕《中华人民共和国体育法》对体育所做的分类而进行论述。所发表的论文研究范围比较广泛,但不成体系,存在着大量的薄弱环节。在国外,对体育法范围的界定一般比较宽泛,在美国、英国、加拿大、德国、日本等国,各种不同的体育法书籍讨论了广泛的体育法论题,对构建我国的体育法学体系有重要的启示。我们认为,体育法的范围应包括体育法基础理论、体育实体法和体育程序法。体育法基础理论研究包括对体育法的概念、特征、渊源、范围、效力等的研究。体育实体法包括体育宪法、体育民商法、体育刑法、体育行政法等,体育程序法包括体育行会内部纠纷解决程序、体育调解、兴奋剂检测程序、体育仲裁、体育诉讼等。
[Abstract]:The definition of the word "sports" is the premise and basis for discussing the concept and scope of sports law. At present, in the field of sports, there is no accurate answer to the definition of the term sports, and there are various different concepts. We should accept the concept of sports, that is, "sport", and should make a broad understanding of sports. That is, physical education includes not only physical education, but also competitive sports and mass sports. There are also different models to define the concept of sports from the perspective of law. There is no strict definition of sports in the current Sports Law of the people's Republic of China. We think that only part of the sports behavior can enter the vision of sports law. The extension of sports from the perspective of law should be smaller than the extension of the concept of sports in a broad sense. There is plenty of evidence that sports law exists and is already an independent field of law, according to which sports law is the legal rule of the state to regulate sports (such as British legislation against football hooligans). The anti-doping legislation of our country) and the general name of the rules created by the parties to sports (including sports guilds) to adjust their sports relationship with each other. The first kind of rules have the characteristics of public force mandatory, the latter kind of rules have the characteristics of autonomy, professionalism and non-public force mandatory. Sports law has its own characteristics, the first is pluralism, which is manifested in the pluralism of the origin of sports law and the pluralism of the source of effectiveness. The second is international. The internationality of sports determines the internationality of sports law, and international sports law is taking shape. The third is technical, sports as a specialized activity, its technical characteristics determine the technical nature of sports law. Sports law has its own unique research scope. The definition of the scope of sports law in domestic sports law textbooks is different, but it basically revolves around the classification of sports in the Sports Law of the people's Republic of China. The research scope of the published paper is extensive, but it is not systematic, and there are a lot of weak links. In foreign countries, the definition of the scope of sports law is generally relatively broad. In the United States, Britain, Canada, Germany, Japan and other countries, various sports law books discuss a wide range of sports law topics. It has important enlightenment to the construction of sports law system in our country. We think that the scope of sports law should include the basic theory of sports law, sports substantive law and sports procedure law. The research on the basic theory of sports law includes the study of the concept, characteristics, origin, scope and effectiveness of sports law. Sports substantive law includes sports constitution, sports civil and commercial law, sports criminal law, sports administrative law and so on. Sports procedure law includes internal dispute resolution procedure of sports guild, sports mediation, doping testing procedure, sports arbitration, sports litigation and so on.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:D922.16

【引证文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 秦毅;;对《中华人民共和国体育法》核心价值评析[J];北京体育大学学报;2009年12期

2 秦毅;;对体育法价值定义的探讨[J];河北体育学院学报;2012年02期

3 韩勇;;中国体育法学研究:从法解释学到法社会学[J];体育科学;2010年03期

4 吕伟;;一个屋檐下的体育法——体育法方法论的路径选择与思考[J];成都体育学院学报;2012年11期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 李先燕;《中华人民共和国体育法》修改的价值取向研究[D];北京体育大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 黄亮;体育法律领域中的“第三类规则”[D];湘潭大学;2011年

2 赵怀志;临时组织型体育风险致害案件适用风险自受原则的反思[D];中国政法大学;2009年

3 宋猛;南京国民政府体育法制研究[D];南京师范大学;2012年

4 黄世昌;世界跆拳道联盟法律问题研究[D];湘潭大学;2011年



本文编号:2485098

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2485098.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0142c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com