我国督促程序的现状与再完善

发布时间：2017-12-28 14:21

本文关键词：我国督促程序的现状与再完善　出处：《上海交通大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：督促程序作为快速解决现代债务纠纷的一项法律机制,是在社会商品经济快速发展的当下应运而生的,其产生的使命便是灵活、迅速地帮助债权人以低成本、低时耗实现其债权,减少当事人的诉讼不便,以及减轻法院的工作负担。然而,督促程序自1991年被我国民事诉讼法引入以来,在过去的20几年时间里,其工作状态和生存现状都不如预期设想的那样完美,甚至与当初设立它的初衷大相径庭。其低适用率、低生效率似乎表示着督促程序是一项可有可无,乃至多此一举的程序。本文旨在通过对督促程序存在现状的分析找出其空置的原因,并结合2013年颁布的新修改的《民事诉讼法》的相关规定对督促程序的进一步完善提出个人的意见和看法。本文共分为三部分。第一部分对督促程序进行了概述,介绍了督促程序在不同国家的不同涵义,并界定了它的性质。此外,作者还介绍了督促程序在国外其他国家和地区的立法进程,并对比之在我国的立法进程。第二部分描述了督促程序在我国的运行现状,并分析了其不受重视的原因,包括支付令程序的自身原因以及它所生存的环境因素。第三部分,笔者立足我国国情现状,在第二部分分析的基础之上,结合新修改的民诉法对督促程序的再完善从其法律制度角度和外部环境角度提出自己的建议。
[Abstract]:Supervise the program as a legal mechanism to quickly solve modern debt disputes, emerged in the rapid development of social commodity economy today, its mission is to flexibly and quickly to help creditors with low cost, low consumption to realize the creditor's rights, the parties to reduce litigation inconvenience, and reduce the burden of the court. However, since the introduction of the supervision procedure in 1991 by the Civil Procedure Law of China, its working condition and living condition in the past 20 years have not been as perfect as expected, even with the original intention of its original establishment. The application of low rate and low production efficiency seems to represent a supervision procedure is not essential, and even make an unnecessary move program. The purpose of this paper is to find out the reasons of its vacancy through the analysis of the current situation of the supervision procedure, and put forward personal opinions and opinions on the further improvement of the supervision procedure according to the relevant regulations of the newly revised civil procedure law promulgated in 2013. This article is divided into three parts. The first part gives an overview of the process of supervision and promotion, introduces the different meanings of the process of supervision and promotion in different countries, and defines its nature. In addition, the author also introduces the legislative process of the supervision procedure in other countries and regions in foreign countries, and compares it with the legislative process in China. The second part describes the operation status of the supervision procedure in China, and analyzes the reasons why it is not valued, including the reasons for the payment order itself and the environmental factors it exists. The third part, the author based on the current situation of our country, on the basis of the second part's analysis, put forward their own proposals from the perspective of the legal system and the external environment angle to further improve the supervising procedure according to the newly revised civil procedure law.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】