排除合理怀疑的异域嬗变与本土启示

发布时间：2017-12-31 11:22

本文关键词：排除合理怀疑的异域嬗变与本土启示　出处：《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：排除合理怀疑产生于西方世界对宗教与知识的思考,是错误定罪的灵魂恐惧与认知局限的现实反思交互作用的结果。早期的排除合理怀疑作为一种非普遍性的规则在美国的各州渐进发展,陪审制度的现实需要催生了定义的兴起,"道德确信"的定义曾在19世纪备受推崇。伴随着定义的发展,排除合理怀疑最终成为联邦宪法的一部分。然而,经历了辉煌巅峰期的排除合理怀疑在定义之争的浪潮中逐渐走向衰落,美国联邦最高法院对定义的否定性评价使其站在了命运的十字路口。以美国排除合理怀疑标准的发展趋势和学界回应为借鉴,我国排除合理怀疑标准的完善应率先在制度体系的视角下审视诸如无罪推定、不得强迫自证其罪和传闻证据规则等配套制度的构建路径,同时对合理怀疑的特征、性质做出妥当的界定,并在此基础上探讨合理怀疑的排除路径和裁判方式。
[Abstract]:Beyond reasonable doubt arises from the thought of religion and knowledge in the western world. It is the result of the interaction between the soul fear of false conviction and the reality reflection of cognitive limitation. Early reasonable doubt as a kind of non-universal rule has gradually developed in the states of the United States. The reality of jury system led to the rise of definitions, the definition of "moral conviction" was highly respected in 19th century. With the development of definition, beyond reasonable doubt eventually became part of the federal constitution. After a period of brilliant peak without reasonable doubt in the definition of the tide of the gradual decline. The negative evaluation of the definition by the Federal Supreme Court of the United States makes it stand at the crossroads of destiny. In order to perfect the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt, our country should take the lead in examining the path of construction of supporting system, such as presumption of innocence and rules of hearsay evidence and so on, from the perspective of system system. At the same time, the characteristics and nature of reasonable doubt are properly defined, and on the basis of this, the way of eliminating reasonable doubt and the way of judgment are discussed.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部新世纪人才支持项目(NCET-12-0984) 中南财经政法大学研究生创新教育计划资助项目(2014YS0501)
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 排除合理怀疑是英美法系一项刑事定罪的证明标准,从其产生至今都表现出优越的制度价值,并在平衡打击犯罪和人权保障的价值中发挥着不可或缺的作用。2012年修正通过的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(以下简称《刑事诉讼法》)第53条正式写入了“排除合理怀疑”,作为解释“证据确

【相似文献】