论民事抗诉制度新构造与典型民事诉讼的原理相融性

发布时间：2018-01-03 02:22

本文关键词：论民事抗诉制度新构造与典型民事诉讼的原理相融性　出处：《中外法学》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：民事抗诉制度是具有中国特色的民事诉讼制度,学界质疑民事抗诉系检察权"介入"民事诉讼,与传统的以两造当事人平等对席、法官居中裁判的等腰三角形结构为基本样式之典型民事诉讼的原理不相融。从构造层面分析,1991年《民事诉讼法》框架下的民事抗诉制度属于"两阶构造",确实存在前述问题。但经过2007年和2012年《民事诉讼法》的修改,民事抗诉制度形成了全新的"五阶构造",包含了前后相续的双等腰三角形的关系结构。新构造下的民事抗诉制度与再审之诉制度在程序构造和通行原则上遵循同样的原理,表明民事抗诉制度新构造与典型民事诉讼存在着原理相融性。
[Abstract]:Civil protest system is a civil litigation system with Chinese characteristics. Scholars have questioned that civil protest is a kind of procuratorial power to "intervene" in civil litigation, which is equal to the traditional "two parties". The principle of the typical civil action in which the equilateral triangle structure of the judge in the center is the basic pattern is not compatible. In 1991, the civil protest system under the framework of "Civil procedure Law" belongs to the "two-order structure", which does exist the above-mentioned problems, but after 2007 and 2012, the Civil procedure Law was amended. Civil protest system has formed a new "five-order structure". The civil protest system under the new structure and the retrial system follow the same principles in procedure construction and general principle. It shows that the new structure of civil protest system and the typical civil action have the same principle.
【作者单位】：浙江省社会科学院法学所;
【基金】：作者主持的浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(课题编号14NDJC216YB)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1
【正文快照】： 引言民事抗诉制度是我国民事诉讼制度的构成部分,但缘于大陆法系民事诉讼理论的标准语境,我国学界存在着将“民事抗诉”概念与“民事诉讼”概念予以分置理解的语用习惯,突出表现为将“民事抗诉”理解为检察权对民事诉讼自身程序的“外部介人”。〔1〕言下之意,没有检察权介

【相似文献】