司法改革框架下的“硬件升级”:我国法院刑事法庭空间布局的再探索——以平衡“权”与“利”为切入点

发布时间：2018-01-04 09:44

本文关键词：司法改革框架下的“硬件升级”:我国法院刑事法庭空间布局的再探索——以平衡“权”与“利”为切入点　出处：《法律适用》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法庭作为审判特定场所,是国家司法体系中不可或缺的"硬件"。现阶段我国刑事法庭空间布局落后于刑事诉讼理念革新的步伐,应成为新一轮司法改革关注热点并予以全面"升级"。笔者通过实证考察,反思现行布局存在的违背合议庭运行机制、损害被告人权益、影响鉴定人及证人作用发挥等6大缺陷,比较和借鉴各国典型法庭布局模式,平衡各方"权"、"利",构造出一种满足于新时期法治理念与现实需要的庭审结构——即突破传统中国式固有思维,根据刑事案件属性、庭审诉讼程序的不同来确定被告人的位置,力求为新一轮司法改革提供有益借鉴。
[Abstract]:The court as a specific place of trial, is the national judicial system is an integral part of the "hardware". At the present stage of China's criminal court space layout behind the idea of criminal litigation reform, should become the focus of a new round of judicial reform and comprehensively upgrade. Through empirical study, there is to reflect on the current layout against the collegial panel the operation mechanism, damage the rights of the defendant, witness and identification of human influence to play the role of the 6 defects, comparing and drawing lessons from the typical court layout mode, and balance all the "right", "benefit", the construction of a meet in the trial -- Breakthrough structure in the new period to the concept of the rule of law and the reality of the traditional China type inherent thinking, according to the property of criminal cases, the trial procedure to determine the defendant's different position, and strive to provide a useful reference for a new round of judicial reform.

【作者单位】：广东省广州市白云区人民法院民三庭;广东省广州市白云区人民法院刑庭;
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 法庭布局不仅是国家司法文化与诉讼理念最基本直观的体现,〔1〕而且蕴含着惩治犯罪、教育引导、〔2〕树立司法威信、提高庭审效率的内涵。〔3〕继2013年河南法院在全国范围内首次改变刑事法庭布局后,〔4〕今年5月,浙江法院也开始创新采用“三角形”庭审格局。〔5〕让人更耳目

【参考文献】