证据属性理论的再思考——基于民事诉讼程序的动态解析

发布时间：2018-01-06 08:41

本文关键词：证据属性理论的再思考——基于民事诉讼程序的动态解析　出处：《山东警察学院学报》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从对证据属性理论"客观性"、"关联性"和"合法性"三性的逻辑悖论的分析到结合民事诉讼程序的动态考察所发现的诸多问题来看,以传统的、静态的视角研究证据属性的方法已经式微,有必要从程序法的视角,根据程序的动态变化重新认识证据,所有进入案件程序的与案件有关的材料均为证据,而不必纠结于所谓的证据属性理论。采用程序性证据概念,明确区分"何为证据"和"何种证据能被采用并具有多大证明力",对于避免证据属性理论造成的"证据怪圈",维持证据理论的科学性和稳定性,指导我国实践中证据规则体系的完善具有重要价值。
[Abstract]:From the analysis of the three logical paradoxes of "objectivity", "relevance" and "legality" in the theory of attribute of evidence, to the many problems found in combination with the dynamic investigation of civil procedure, it is traditional. The method of studying the attribute of evidence from the static angle of view has declined. It is necessary to re-recognize the evidence according to the dynamic changes of the procedure from the perspective of the procedural law. All the materials related to the case entering the case procedure are evidence. There is no need to dwell on the so-called evidence attribute theory. The concept of procedural evidence is used to distinguish between "what is evidence" and "what kind of evidence can be used and how much proof it has". It is of great value to avoid the "strange circle of evidence" caused by the theory of evidence attribute, to maintain the scientific nature and stability of the evidence theory and to guide the perfection of the system of evidence rules in our country's practice.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“当代中国人口流动性背景下的缺席审判制度研究”(项目批准号:09YJC820075)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1
【正文快照】： 证据属性理论被公认为证据基本理论中的核心理论,是证据法学研究的起点,把握证据属性理论才能更好地理解、使用诉讼证据,以发现真实,定分止争。但是与其基石性地位不符的是,证据属性理论本身却一直众说纷纭。对证据属性的内容,在21世纪初理论界有过激烈的探讨,学者们先后提出

【相似文献】