不利于青少年犯回归的程序制度之检讨

发布时间：2018-01-06 10:23

本文关键词：不利于青少年犯回归的程序制度之检讨　出处：《昆明理工大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着经济的发展,青少年刑事案件呈高发态势,引起了刑法理论界与司法实务界的重视与关注。长期以来,社会各界对于减少青少年犯罪持有积极的态度,特别是相关法律法规的颁布,对于挽救青少年犯作出了明确的规定。梁启超曾说“少年强则国强,少年智则国智,”让青少年犯回归社会、为跌落犯罪泥潭的青少年犯打造“重启”人生的钥匙,对青少年犯是意义深远的。建立青少年犯回归社会的程序制度是适应我国当前的青少年刑事政策的现实需要,所以对于青少年犯回归社会问题应首先从制度层面入手。近20多年来,我国在青少年司法理念上一直实行“教育、感化、挽救”的方针和坚持“教育为主、惩罚为辅”的原则,在青少年犯回归社会的程序制度上尽管取得了显著的成绩,但与其他先进国家相比,现有的青少年犯罪侦查制度、检察制度、审判制度、执行制度方面还有不合理之处,有些新的司法理念还未引入,需要进一步解决、完善。本文将对青少年犯回归社会的程序制度进行深入系统的研究,并提出一些粗浅的看法,以构建有利于我国青少年犯回归的程序制度。首先,梳理出我国不利于青少年犯回归的侦查制度、检察制度、审判制度、执行制度中的具体内容。其次,分析大陆法系、英美法系、港澳台的青少年犯回归的程序制度,并从中探讨出这些制度对我国制度设计的启示。最后,构建有利于青少年犯回归的程序法律制度。在侦查制度方面完善撤案制度与全面调查制度,限制强制措施的使用等；在检察制度方面完善暂缓起诉制度、相对不起诉制度、分案起诉制度：在审判制度方面推行暂缓判决制度、少年法院,强化刑事和解,规范圆桌审判模式等；在执行制度方面创设特殊的社区矫正制度、缓刑制度与减刑、假释制度,增设社会服务令。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, juvenile criminal cases show a trend of high incidence, which has aroused the attention and attention of the criminal theory and judicial practice. For a long time, all walks of life have a positive attitude towards reducing juvenile delinquency. In particular, the promulgation of relevant laws and regulations, for the rescue of juvenile offenders made clear provisions. Liang Qichao once said that "juvenile strength is strong, juvenile intelligence is national wisdom," let young offenders return to society. Create the key to "restart" life for the young offenders who fall into the quagmire of crime. It is of far-reaching significance to young offenders. It is necessary to establish a procedure system for young offenders to return to the society to meet the actual needs of our country's current juvenile criminal policy. Therefore, the return of juvenile offenders to society should start from the system level. In the past 20 years, our country has been implementing the "education, influence, rescue" policy and adhere to the "education as the main principle" in the concept of juvenile justice. In spite of the remarkable achievements in the procedural system of the return of young offenders to society, the principle of supplementary punishment is compared with other advanced countries, such as the investigation system of juvenile delinquency, the procuratorial system, and the judicial system. There are still some unreasonable aspects of the implementation system, some new judicial concepts have not been introduced, need to be further resolved, perfect. This paper will carry out a deep and systematic study on the procedure system of juvenile offenders returning to society. And put forward some superficial views in order to build a procedural system conducive to the return of juvenile offenders in China. First of all, comb out the investigation system, procuratorial system, trial system that is not conducive to the return of juvenile delinquents in our country. Secondly, it analyzes the procedure system of the return of juvenile offenders in civil law system, Anglo-American law system, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and probes into the enlightenment of these systems to the system design of our country. Constructing the procedural legal system which is conducive to the return of juvenile offenders, perfecting the system of withdrawing cases and comprehensive investigation system in the investigation system, restricting the use of compulsory measures, etc. In the procuratorial system, improve the system of deferred prosecution, relative non-prosecution system, split prosecution system: in the trial system to implement the system of deferred judgment, juvenile courts, strengthen criminal reconciliation, standardize the round-table trial model; In the aspect of execution system, special community correction system, probation system and commutation system, parole system and social service order are established.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2;D669.5

【相似文献】