民事裁判共识的博弈构建

发布时间：2018-01-17 17:40

本文关键词：民事裁判共识的博弈构建　出处：《政法论丛》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：民事裁判不是裁判者单方的意志体现,而是在裁判法官与诉讼当事人之间建立有效的对话沟通机制并依法作出处理的过程。这种对话沟通机制是以双方当事人之间、当事人与法院之间的对话博弈为主要内容,通过当事人双方和法院构成的共同体来协商运作,最终达成各参与主体都愿意接受的共识。这种裁判共识机制不仅需要建立对话与讨论的公共平台,还需要综合考虑法律、事实和社会三个方面的因素,构建一种合理而公正的程序机制,找到各方都能接受的纳什均衡点,尽可能实现各方的利益最大化。民事裁判共识的实现不仅要得到诉讼主体的共同认可,还要得到社会公众的认同。
[Abstract]:Civil judgment is not the embodiment of the referee's unilateral will. It is the process of establishing an effective dialogue and communication mechanism between the judge and the litigant and dealing with it according to law. The dialogue game between the parties and the court is the main content, through the community of the parties and the court to negotiate the operation. Finally, to reach the consensus that each participant is willing to accept. This kind of consensus mechanism not only needs to establish a public platform for dialogue and discussion, but also needs to consider the legal, factual and social factors. To construct a reasonable and fair procedural mechanism, to find the Nash equilibrium that all parties can accept, and to maximize the interests of the parties as far as possible. The realization of the consensus of civil adjudication should not only be recognized by the litigant. And get the approval of the public.
【作者单位】：衡阳师范学院人文社科系;
【基金】：湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目“博弈逻辑视角下‘司法公正梦’的实现路径研究”(14A022) 湘潭大学诉讼法学研究中心开放课题“民事裁判的博弈分析”(12fx005) 湖南省情与决策咨询研究课题“加快推进湖南教育公平的博弈路径研究”(2014ZZ077)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D926.2;D925.1
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出近年来,无论在理论界还是实务界,民事裁判方式的改革已成为一个社会讨论的热点话题。20世纪90年代以前,中国的民事审判制度主要为职权主义诉讼模式。由于法院对当事人的私权干预太多,忽视当事人的自主意识,引起部分法官利用职权谋取私利,同时法官过多的干预也使

【参考文献】