“排除合理怀疑”实证研究

发布时间：2018-01-25 13:09

本文关键词： 刑事诉讼证明标准排除合理怀疑　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：证明标准在诉讼法以及证据法中都是相当重要的制度，同时也是一个理论性和实践性都很强的问题，可以说处于诉讼程序中证据制度的核心地位。此次刑诉法修改，将“排除合理怀疑”引入我国证明标准中来，体现出立法者借鉴英美法系先进制度的开放心态。但“排除合理怀疑”不仅是一个单纯的法律术语，其引入必将带来一系列的问题，本文将对这些问题进行简要探讨。文章导言部分以“薄熙来案”庭审的成功引出关于证明标准修法问题的探讨，并就目前理论界和实务界的研究现状进行了简要介绍，陈述了文章的着眼点、目的意义以及研究方法。第一章为刑事诉讼法关于证明标准的修缮评析，本章主要对本次刑事诉讼法对证明标准的修缮情况进行了简介和评述，首先对条文进行了对比，对字面的直观变化做出比较；其次对条文背后所反映的立法进步进行了深刻剖析，意在阐明其程序进步价值。第二章如何理解“排除合理怀疑”，本章主要是对“排除合理怀疑”内涵的分析，首先对英美法系国家的不同观点和做法进行了介绍，主要是对西方法制背景下“排除合理怀疑”的发展沿革和历史背景的说明；其次，将其与我国法制环境现状相对比，在明确差异的基础上对我国引入的“合理怀疑”的内涵进行更准确地理解。第三章为我国排除合理怀疑的适用，本章主要是运用了案例分析的实证研究法，通过选取涵盖不同要素的案件，比如什么是“合理怀疑”，心证的不同阶段中如何“排除合理怀疑”，通过层次性地对“排除合理怀疑”进行更为直观地分析和应用，以期对司法实践中法官给予示范。第四章为基于实证困境的相关制度完善，，本章主要是从控诉方、辩护方、审判人员三方的角度，对目前所反映出来的标准适用障碍进行梳理，并针对这些障碍提出了一些有助于破除障碍的相关制度环境完善，主要从法律制度和法制环境两个方面进行分析，以期保障引入后的“排除合理怀疑”标准有一个更良好的发展土壤。
[Abstract]:The standard of proof is a very important system in both procedural law and evidence law, and it is also a problem of strong theory and practice. It can be said to be in the core position of the evidence system in the litigation procedure. The revision of the Criminal procedure Law will introduce "beyond reasonable doubt" into the standard of proof in our country. It reflects the openness of legislators to learn from the advanced system of Anglo-American legal system, but "beyond reasonable doubt" is not only a simple legal term, but its introduction will inevitably bring about a series of problems. This paper briefly discusses these problems. In the introduction part of the article, the successful trial of Bo Xilai case leads to the discussion on the revision of the standard of proof, and briefly introduces the current research situation of the theoretical and practical circles, and states the starting points of the article. Objective significance and research methods. The first chapter is about the revision of the standard of proof of criminal procedure law. This chapter mainly introduces and comments on the repair of the standard of proof in this criminal procedure law. First of all, the article is compared. To make the comparison to the literal visual change; Secondly, the legislative progress reflected behind the articles is deeply analyzed, with a view to clarifying the value of its procedural progress. The second chapter is about how to understand "eliminating reasonable doubt". This chapter mainly analyzes the connotation of "eliminating reasonable doubt", first of all, it introduces the different views and practices of Anglo-American legal system countries. It mainly explains the development and historical background of "beyond reasonable doubt" under the background of western legal system. Secondly, by comparing it with the present situation of legal environment in China, the connotation of "reasonable doubt" introduced in China is understood more accurately on the basis of clear differences. The third chapter is the application of our country beyond reasonable doubt, this chapter is mainly using the empirical research method of case analysis, through the selection of cases covering different elements, such as what is "reasonable doubt". How to "remove reasonable doubt" in different stages of heart-proof, and analyze and apply it more intuitively through hierarchical analysis and application, in order to give a demonstration to the judge in judicial practice. Chapter 4th is based on the empirical difficulties of the relevant system improvement, this chapter is mainly from the prosecution, the defence, the trial staff from the perspective of tripartite, the current reflected the standard of the application of obstacles to comb. And in view of these obstacles put forward some help to overcome the obstacles of the relevant institutional environment perfect, mainly from the legal system and legal environment two aspects of analysis. In order to ensure the introduction of "beyond reasonable doubt" standard has a better development soil.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】