论涉案财物刑事扣押制度的完善

发布时间：2018-01-25 23:18

本文关键词： 涉案财物刑事扣押强制执行力立法完善　出处：《中南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：摘要：新《刑事诉讼法》实施后,物证、书证的收集在刑事诉讼中尤为重要。物证、书证的主要取证方式是刑事扣押,涉案财物的刑事扣押是侦查机关在刑事诉讼过程中,强制性对财物扣押的一种强制性措施。由于我国长期受重实体轻程序的观念影响,对涉案财物刑事扣押强制执行方面的立法还不完善,导致涉案财物刑事扣押缺乏强制执行力。究其原因,一方面是法律对涉案财物刑事扣押的程序没有具体规定,涉案财物持有人对履行刑事扣押没有法律强制义务。另一方面是我国涉案财物刑事扣押的范围不明确,何种情况下才能且必须对涉案财物刑事扣押没有法律依据。侦查机关集刑事扣押批准权与刑事扣押执行权于一体,侦查机关启动刑事扣押程序随意性大,且刑事扣押的范围不明确,致使侦查机关随意扩大扣押的范围,有损刑事强制扣押的严肃性。在管理制度方面不健全,扣押人与保管人未分离、扣押物品未进行分类保管等现象普遍存在。在赔偿救济方面制度不完善,法律、规章对错误的扣押没有规定有效的补救措施。这些是影响涉案财物持有人不愿交出涉案财物的内在原因。应当完善涉案财物刑事扣押的相关立法,在《刑事诉讼法》中利用专门章节规定涉案财物的刑事扣押,将刑事扣押列为一种强制措施,使刑事扣押具有强制执行力,使其有可操作性,以达到树立司法权威的目的；在相关的法律、制度中,建立刑事扣押前的令状主义审查制度,完善刑事扣押中的管理制度,健全刑事扣押后的赔偿救济制度。
[Abstract]:Abstract: after the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, the collection of material evidence and documentary evidence is particularly important in criminal proceedings. The criminal seizure of the property involved in the case is a compulsory measure for the investigation organs in the process of criminal proceedings, because of the long-term influence of the concept of valuing the substance and ignoring the procedure in our country. Criminal seizure of property involved in the enforcement of legislation is not perfect, resulting in the lack of enforcement of the criminal seizure of property involved. Investigate the reasons. On the one hand, the law has no specific provisions on the procedure of criminal seizure of property involved in the case, and the holder of the property involved in the case has no legal compulsory obligation to perform the criminal seizure. On the other hand, the scope of criminal seizure of property involved in our country is not clear. What circumstances can and must be involved in the criminal seizure of property without legal basis. Investigation organs set criminal arrest approval and criminal seizure execution power in one, the investigation organs to initiate criminal seizure procedures arbitrary. And the scope of criminal detention is not clear, resulting in the investigation organs to arbitrarily expand the scope of detention, damage to the seriousness of criminal mandatory detention, in the management system is not perfect, the detainees and custodians are not separated. The phenomenon of unclassified custody of seized articles is widespread. The system of compensation and relief is not perfect and the law is not perfect. The regulations do not provide effective remedies for false seizure. These are the internal reasons that affect the property holders' unwillingness to hand over the property involved. The relevant legislation on criminal seizure of the involved property should be improved. In the "Criminal procedure Law", the criminal seizure of property involved in the use of a special section as a coercive measure, so that the criminal seizure has the enforcement force, make it operable. To achieve the purpose of establishing judicial authority; In the relevant laws and systems, we should establish the writ review system before the criminal detention, perfect the management system in the criminal detention, and perfect the compensation and relief system after the criminal detention.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】