论我国民事执行中的案外人异议之诉

发布时间：2018-01-25 23:24

本文关键词： 民事执行执行救济案外人异议之诉　出处：《辽宁大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国正处于政治、经济、文化发展的快车道,在民事司法领域中判决的执行作为维护司法公正的最后一道防线变得越来越重要。而“执行乱”和“执行难”的现象依然普遍存在,就我国实务层面来看,当事人、案外人提起执行异议的案件数量仍然占有相当的比重。虽然这一部分的民诉法经历了2007年的完善和修改,但是规定仍稍显笼统、存在漏洞,一些问题在理论上的争议依然存在而且实践中也有一些模糊地带尚待明确。我国的民事执行中的案外人异议之诉制度是通过我国现行《民事诉讼法》第227条确立的。然而在司法实践中关于案外人异议之诉的性质、前置程序、提起诉讼的主体范围、有管辖法院中哪个具体部门受理等问题都没有明确。本文在研究案外人异议之诉的过程中主要运用了体统分析法和比较分析法进行论证。本文的主体分为四个部分:第一部分笔者开宗明义地提出案外人异议之诉的概念,通过讨论该概念的性质、构成要件以及与易混淆概念的区别,突出本文的核心概念;第二个部分主要论述了我国案外人异议之诉的发展现状,通过对现状的评析结合辩证法讨论当前我国案外人异议之诉取得的成绩与存在的局限;第三个部分采用比较分析法,取域外相关法律之所长,为我所用,通过论证英美法系和大陆法系几个具有代表性国家的相关法律规定,希望能够总结归纳出适合我们国家基本国情和制度建构的经验;第四部分是本文的重点,通过以上三部分的论证,笔者将在此总结完善我国案外人异议之诉的建议,并将其分为结构性建议、局部完善建议、对于恶意诉讼的制裁三个部分予以呈现。笔者借本文以期完整展现出我国案外人异议之诉的整体面貌并就不足之处予以完善,维护案外人的合法权益,保障案件审理的公平公正。
[Abstract]:China is on the fast track of political, economic and cultural development. In the field of civil justice, the execution of judgments as the last line of defense to maintain judicial justice has become more and more important. However, the phenomenon of "chaos of execution" and "difficulty of execution" is still widespread, from the point of view of our country's practice. Although the civil action law in this part has experienced the perfection and revision in 2007, the provisions are still slightly general, and there are loopholes. Some problems still exist in theory and there are still some vague areas to be clarified in practice. In our civil execution, the system of dissenting action by outsiders is passed through Article 227 of the current Civil procedure Law of our country. However, in judicial practice, the nature of the dissenting action of the outsider in the case. Pre-procedure, the scope of the subject of litigation. It is not clear which specific department accepts in the jurisdiction court and so on. This article mainly uses the system analysis method and the comparative analysis method in the process of studying the case of the outsider dissent lawsuit. The main body of this article is divided into four parts. Subdivision:. In the first part, the author puts forward the concept of the dissenting action of the outsider in the case clearly at the beginning of the article. By discussing the nature of the concept, the constitutive elements and the differences between the concept and the confusing concept, the core concepts of this paper are highlighted. The second part mainly discusses the status quo of the dissent action of the outsider in our country, and discusses the achievements and limitations of the dissent action of the outsider in our country through the analysis of the present situation and the dialectics. The third part uses the comparative analysis method, takes the advantage of the extraterritorial related laws, and proves the relevant laws and regulations of several representative countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system through the demonstration of the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system. Hope to sum up the experience suitable for our country's basic national conditions and system construction; The 4th part is the focus of this paper, through the above three parts of the argument, the author will summarize and improve the case of foreign dissent in China, and divided it into structural recommendations, partial improvement of the recommendations. For the malicious litigation sanctions of the three parts to be presented. The author of this article with a view to complete display of the whole face of our country's outsider dissent action and to improve the deficiencies of the case to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of outsiders. To guarantee the fairness and fairness of the case.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】