第三人撤销诉讼之原告主体资格研究

发布时间：2018-01-26 08:03

本文关键词： 第三人撤销诉讼虚假诉讼再审之诉有独立请求权第三人无独立请求权第三人　出处：《上海交通大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：以遏制虚假诉讼、恶意诉讼为初衷,2012年8月31日第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十八次会议在《关于修改〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的决定》第二次修正中确立了第三人撤销诉讼制度,为受判决书效力扩张力影响的案外第三人提供了程序上的救济途径。然而受我国现有的第三人参加诉讼制度的影响和实务现状的制约,我国第三人撤销之诉能否真正实现其程序保障的救济目的,实现个案正义在学界及实务界依然存在很大的争议。除去引言与结语部分,本文在结构上共分为四个部分。第一部分从第三人撤销诉讼的立法背景入手,探索我国案外人权利救济程序的演变过程,着重对比分析了第三人撤销诉讼与其他权利救济制度的共性与差异。第二部分立足于对第三人撤销诉讼的一般性资格要件的规定,结合民诉法最新司法解释对第三人撤销诉讼的原告适格作出了限制性的要求。第三部分主要对第三人做了详细的描述,结合学界众多专家学者的观点,重点阐述了笔者对于有独立请求权第三人和无独立请求权第三人以及其他受判决既判力扩张影响的案外第三人适用第三人撤销诉讼的观点。第四部分则从不具有第三人撤销诉讼之原告适格的第三人角度出发,对第三人撤销诉讼的适格原告进行排除限缩,主要有诉讼担当、身份关系诉讼、必要共同诉讼中的第三人等。
[Abstract]:To curb false litigation, malicious litigation as the original intention. In August 31st 2012, the 28th session of the standing Committee of the 11th National people's Congress established the third party in the second amendment of the decision on amending the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China. Rescission of the litigation system. It provides a procedural remedy for the third party who is affected by the expanding power of the judgment. However, it is restricted by the influence of the third party's participation in the litigation system and the current situation of practice in our country. Whether the third party can really realize the relief purpose of its procedural protection and realize the case justice in the academic and practical circles are still very controversial. Except the introduction and the conclusion part. This article is divided into four parts in the structure. The first part from the legislative background of the third party revocation proceedings, explore the evolution of the procedure of relief of the rights of the outsider in our country. The second part is based on the provisions of the general qualification requirements of the third party revocation action. The third part mainly describes the third party in detail, combined with the views of many experts and scholars. The author focuses on the author's view that the third party with independent claim and the third party without independent claim, and other cases affected by the extension of res judicata adjudication, should apply the third party revocation action. Part 4th has never had. Third party rescission of the plaintiff appropriate for the perspective of the third party. The suitable plaintiff of the third party's withdrawal action is excluded and reduced, mainly including litigation responsibility, status relationship litigation, third party in necessary joint action, etc.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】