认罪认罚从宽制度实施疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-28 08:16

  本文关键词： 认罪 认罪认罚 从宽 刑事速裁　出处：《中国刑事法杂志》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：认罪认罚从宽制度是对宽严相济刑事政策中"宽"的一面的强调,以推动自首、立功等从宽制度更好地实施,不是在现有从宽基础上再予以额外的从宽。除可能判处死刑、无期徒刑的案件,对选择刑事速裁或其他简化程序的被追诉人,应以独立的实体性从宽措施补偿其程序保障的减损。补偿力度应与程序简化程度成正比。应限制被害人谅解对认罪认罚从宽制度实施的影响力,其不应作为选择刑事速裁或其他简化程序的影响因素;在刑罚适用上,应拒绝被害人绑架司法的行为。从被追诉人能力、辩护人能力与尽职情况及律师独立辩护理论的妥当性考虑,律师无权否定被追诉人的认罪认罚,律师异议不影响认罪认罚从宽制度的适用。
[Abstract]:The lenient system of guilty plea and punishment is an emphasis on the "lenient" side of the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, in order to promote the implementation of the lenient system such as voluntary surrender and meritorious service. No additional leniency is granted on an existing basis... except in cases where the death penalty or life imprisonment may be imposed, indictees who opt for speedy criminal adjudication or other simplified procedures are selected. Independent substantive leniency measures should be used to compensate for the derogation of its procedural safeguards. The compensation should be proportional to the degree of simplification of the procedure. The impact of the victim's understanding on the implementation of the leniency system of guilty pleas and punishment should be limited. It should not be an influential factor in the choice of criminal expedited or other simplified procedures; In the application of the penalty, the victim should be refused to kidnap the judicial behavior. From the ability of the accused, the ability of the defender and due diligence, and the proper consideration of the theory of independent defense of lawyers. The lawyer has no right to deny the plea and punishment of the accused person, and the lawyer's dissent does not affect the application of the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 十八届四中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》明确提出要“完善刑事诉讼中认罪认罚从宽制度”。2016年9月,全国人大常委会通过了《关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的决定》。随后,2016年11，

本文编号：1470236