调审分合的尺度把握与模式选择——兼论《民事诉讼法》修正后诉讼调解制度的演进方向

发布时间：2018-01-28 14:20

本文关键词： 诉讼调解调判结合先行调解诉讼准备调解中心　出处：《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：经过十多年的探索,我国逐步确立了程序前移的诉讼调解制度改革思路,2012年《民事诉讼法修正案》修正案采纳了这一思路,增加规定了先行调解和审前准备程序调解等制度。然而,当前相对分散的诉讼调解程序有"过渡制度"的性质,诉讼调解制度仍需进一步改革。按照我国民事诉讼法的既定方向,把握调解与庭审之间必要的距离尺度,兼顾"调判结合"原则与调审分离理念的实质要求,在立案后、庭审前设置相对集中、统一的调解程序,成立立案、调解与诉讼准备中心,综合处理立案、调解和诉讼准备事务,是下一步改革诉讼调解制度的正确思路和现实选择。
[Abstract]:After more than ten years of exploration, our country has gradually established the reform idea of the procedural mediation system, which was adopted in the amendment of the Civil procedure Law in 2012. Such systems as advance mediation and pre-trial preparatory procedure mediation have been added. However, the current relatively dispersed litigation mediation procedures have the nature of "transitional system". The system of litigation mediation still needs to be further reformed. According to the established direction of our civil procedure law, we should grasp the necessary distance between mediation and trial, and take into account the essential requirements of the principle of "combination of mediation and judgment" and the concept of separation of mediation and trial. After filing the case, set up a relatively centralized, unified mediation procedures, set up a filing, mediation and litigation preparation center, comprehensive handling of filing, mediation and litigation preparation affairs. Is the next step to reform the litigation mediation system of the correct thinking and realistic choice.
【作者单位】：河南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究项目“我国民事裁判的证据路径依赖及其影响——基于6个法院532份一审判决的实证研究”(13YJC820113)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.14
【正文快照】： 我国2012年《民事诉讼法修正案》在总结近年司法实践经验的基础上,对诉讼调解制度作了较大的调整,增加规定了先行调解、审理前准备程序调解等制度。随着民诉法二次修正后的司法实践全面铺开,有学者认为,时至今日,分离调审程序的“改革的共识正在形成,改革的时机正日趋成熟”1

【相似文献】