监察委员会调查权运作的双重困境及其法治路径

发布时间：2018-01-28 23:23

本文关键词： 监察委员会调查权职务犯罪侦查权监察体制改革法治路径　出处：《法学论坛》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：监察委员会调查权兼具"行纪检"调查权的特质,但又不同于其中任何一种调查权,其对职务犯罪的行使也就无法再适用《刑事诉讼法》的相关规定。然而,"行纪检一体化"后所形成的监察委员会调查权的定位异常模糊,不仅容易招致程序正义的质疑,也对人权保障有一定的挑战。为精准定位调查权,消除其运行时可能存在的法治的风险,必须要从宏观立法着手,将《刑事诉讼法》中有关检察机关直接受理案件侦查的规定部分转移至即将制定的《国家监察法》中,新增监察委员会有授权检察机关调查特定职务犯罪的条文,废除或不再规定"双规"、"双指"措施,确保监察委员会调查权在法治轨道上有序运转。
[Abstract]:The investigation power of the supervisory committee has the characteristics of the investigation power of "disciplinary inspection", but it is different from any of the powers of investigation, so the exercise of the duty crime can no longer be applied to the relevant provisions of the Criminal procedure Law. The position of the investigation power of the supervisory committee formed after the "integration of discipline inspection and inspection" is extremely vague, which is not only easy to lead to the challenge of procedural justice, but also a certain challenge to the protection of human rights. In order to eliminate the risk of the rule of law that may exist in its operation, we must start with macro legislation. The provisions of the Criminal procedure Law concerning the direct acceptance of cases by procuratorial organs have been partially transferred to the forthcoming "Law on State Supervision". The new supervisory committee has provisions authorizing procuratorial organs to investigate specific job-related crimes, repealing or not prescribing "double rules" and "double fingers" measures to ensure that the supervisory committee's investigative powers operate in an orderly manner on the track of the rule of law.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地“反腐败法治研究中心”资助成果(2015ZSJD002) 2017年东南大学高校基本业务费(人文社科)省级基地资助项目国家社科基金重点项目“构建中国特色‘预惩协同型’反腐败国家立法体系战略问题研究”(16AFX002)的阶段成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 调查是有效监察的前提,如何准确理解、定位监察委员会调查权是国家监察体制改革的重要着眼点。2016年11月7日,中共中央办公厅印发《关于在北京市、山西省、浙江省开展国家监察体制改革试点方案》(以下简称《试点方案》),拉开了国家监察体制改革的序幕;随后,2016年12月25日,十

【相似文献】