公诉案卷移送制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-29 23:58

本文关键词： 案卷移送制度起诉书一本主义法官预断　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改后,运行十六年的公诉案卷移送制度修改为“全卷移送”。恢复1979年的全卷移送,并适用1996年的形式审查。有学者认为这是我国公诉案卷移送制度的倒退,法官预断,庭审形式化等一系列问题仍无法避免,进而主张再次修改,移植域外的起诉书一本主义,笔者并不赞同这种观点。起诉书一本主义的运行有其特定的诉讼环境,与英美法系的诉讼文化息息相关,而且起诉书一本主义的运行同样离不开英美法系独特的具体的司法制度。笔者认为2012年刑诉法关于案卷移送制度的修改不是一种倒退,更不是对1979年全卷移送的简单恢复,从我国诉讼理念、审判方式及司法资源现状等方面考虑,这是我国刑诉法历经三十多年的发展所做出的适合我国司法现状的选择。对各方面综合考虑,我国不适合适用起诉书一本主义。不可否认的是,我国现行全卷移送制度仍然有需要完善的地方。我们有必要对案卷移送制度进行全面梳理,一方面通过借鉴域外案卷制度运行的经验,另一方面综合考量我国案卷移送制度立法历程,以期在结合理论基础之上对完善我国现行公诉案卷移送制度提出有效的意见。笔者对案卷移送制度进行概述,侧重从案卷移送制度概念、类型和成因方面来探讨案卷移送制度的有关问题。通过对域外公诉案卷移送制度进行比较,详细分析介绍域外案卷移送制度的运行过程,总结出该制度对我国公诉案卷移送制度运行的启示,以概括出对进一步更好构建我国全卷移送制度的有益经验。后主要详细介绍我国公诉案卷移送制度的立法历程:首先详细考察分析我国公诉案卷移送制度在1979年、1996年和2012年的运行状态;其次,着重总结反思我国公诉案卷移送制度立法历程中需要明确的一系列问题,比如详细分析我国现行的公诉案卷移送制度并不是一种倒退,我国不适合运行起诉书一本主义,法官预断并不必然导致审判不公等。通过对我国现行公诉案卷移送制度的详细介绍,从中概括出该制度在司法实践中存在的需要解决的问题。最后,主要对我国全卷移送制度存在的问题提出针对性的完善意见。
[Abstract]:After the revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the transfer system of public prosecution files, which has been in operation for 16 years, was revised to "full volume transfer", and the full volume transfer of 1979 was resumed. Some scholars believe that this is the retrogression of the transfer system of the public prosecution file in China, judges' judgment, trial formalization and a series of problems can not be avoided. The author does not agree with this view. The operation of indictment monism has its specific litigation environment, which is closely related to the litigation culture of Anglo-American law system. Moreover, the operation of indictment monism can not be separated from the unique and specific judicial system of Anglo-American law system. The author thinks that the revision of the criminal procedure law on the transfer system of case file in 2012 is not a retrogression. It is not the simple restoration of the transfer of the whole volume in 1979, which is considered from the aspects of the concept of litigation, the way of trial and the current situation of judicial resources in our country. This is the choice that our criminal procedure law has made after more than 30 years of development, which is suitable for the current judicial situation of our country. Considering all aspects synthetically, our country is not suitable to apply indictment monism. It is undeniable that. China's current full volume transfer system still needs to be improved. It is necessary for us to comb the case transfer system in an all-round way, on the one hand, by learning from the experience of the operation of the extraterritorial file system. On the other hand, it comprehensively considers the legislative process of the transfer system of our country's case file, in order to put forward effective opinions on perfecting the transfer system of the current public prosecution file on the basis of the theory. The author summarizes the transfer system of the case file. Focus on the concept, types and causes of file transfer system to explore the relevant issues of the transfer system. Through the transfer system of foreign public prosecution file transfer system is compared. This paper analyzes and introduces the operation process of the system of transferring foreign files in detail, and summarizes the enlightenment of this system to the operation of the transfer system of public prosecution files in China. In order to generalize the beneficial experience of constructing the whole transfer system of our country further, this paper mainly introduces the legislative course of the transfer system of public prosecution file in detail. First of all, a detailed analysis of the transfer system of public prosecution file in 1979. The operational status of 1996 and 2012; Secondly, this paper summarizes a series of problems that need to be clear in the legislative process of the transfer system of public prosecution files in China, such as detailed analysis of the current transfer system of public prosecution files is not a retrogression. Our country is not suitable for running indictment monism, judges' prejudgment does not necessarily lead to unfair trial and so on. Through the detailed introduction of the current transfer system of public prosecution file in our country. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to solve the problems in the system of full volume transfer in our country.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】