行政诉讼非法证据排除规则及适用问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 04:43

本文关键词： 行政诉讼非法证据排除规则立法司法适用完善　出处：《兰州大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：非法证据排除规则是证据学理论研究的热点问题,同样是诉讼法证据规则的制定和司法适用中的难点问题。非法证据排除规则作为诉讼法证据规则体系的不可或缺的部分,在各类诉讼中规范着证据的收集与使用,蕴含着诉讼文明、程序正义、人权保护等法律价值。目前我国对该项规则的研究在刑事诉讼领域较为深入,取得了一定的成果,但是在行政诉讼领域的探讨还存在诸多不足之处。在立法层面,行政诉讼领域中的相关规定较为零散,欠缺系统性与可操作性;在司法适用层面,立法、司法体制、法律意识等方面的诸多问题使我国司法实践中行政诉讼非法证据效力认定存在难度。本文从我国行政诉讼非法证据排除规则的理论和相关规定着手对该规则的若干具体问题进行探讨,同时以司法案例为依托深入讨论和分析司法适用存在的问题及成因,以期能为非法证据排除规则在行政诉讼中的完善提供一些值得参考的思路。本文在参阅大量文献的基础上主要运用规范分析、案例分析与比较研究的方法,分为五章展开论述:第一章以绪论的形式对当前行政诉讼非法证据排除领域的研究现状进行综述,分析和把握研究的不足之处。第二章论述了行政诉讼非法证据排除规则的基本原理,对其内涵、起源与发展、价值理念、三大诉讼非法证据排除规则的关系进行概述。第三章重点论述目前我国行政诉讼非法证据排除规则立法上的演进、现状及问题。第四章针对学界司法适用维度研究的不足,以案例分析为主要方法,分析规则在司法适用中的焦点和难点性问题,对司法适用层面的问题及成因进行深入探讨。第五章针对行政诉讼非法证据排除规则在立法和司法适用中的困境与不足,结合我国司法实践现状与行政诉讼自身的特征,有针对性地提出具有可行性与可操作性的完善对策。
[Abstract]:The rule of exclusion of illegal evidence is a hot issue in the research of evidential theory. The rule of illegal evidence exclusion is an indispensable part of the system of evidence rules of procedural law. The collection and use of evidence is regulated in various kinds of litigation, which contains the legal value of litigation civilization, procedural justice, human rights protection and so on. At present, the study of this rule in our country is more in-depth in the field of criminal procedure. Some achievements have been made, but there are still many deficiencies in the field of administrative litigation. At the legislative level, the relevant provisions in the field of administrative litigation are scattered and lack of systematization and maneuverability. In the judicial application level, the legislation, the judicial system. Legal consciousness and many other problems make it difficult to determine the validity of illegal evidence in administrative litigation in our country. This paper starts with the theory and relevant provisions of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in administrative litigation in our country. To discuss the specific problems. At the same time, based on judicial cases, in-depth discussion and analysis of the problems and causes of judicial application. In order to provide some valuable ideas for the perfection of the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in administrative litigation. This paper mainly uses the methods of normative analysis case analysis and comparative study on the basis of consulting a large number of documents. It is divided into five chapters: the first chapter summarizes the current research status in the field of the exclusion of illegal evidence in administrative proceedings in the form of introduction. The second chapter discusses the basic principle of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in administrative proceedings, its connotation, origin and development, and the concept of value. The third chapter focuses on the legislative evolution of illegal evidence exclusion rules in administrative litigation in China. Chapter 4th aims at the deficiency of the research on the dimension of judicial application in academic circles, taking the case analysis as the main method to analyze the focus and difficulty of the rules in the judicial application. Chapter 5th focuses on the difficulties and deficiencies of the exclusion rules of illegal evidence in administrative proceedings in the legislative and judicial application. Combining with the present situation of judicial practice and the characteristics of administrative litigation itself, this paper puts forward some feasible and operable countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】