论悬赏取证在知识产权侵权诉讼中的审慎适用

发布时间：2018-02-01 19:50

本文关键词： 悬赏取证知识产权诉讼非法证据证据能力　出处：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：悬赏取证作为民事诉讼中当事人举证的特别补强手段,能有效化解现实举证难题。在知识产权侵权诉讼中适用悬赏取证,不仅是基于私权与公益衡平之需要,也是在此类案件事实因关键证据隐匿难寻、技术性强、易灭易失而陷入真伪不明困境时为真相的查明另辟蹊径,同时也体现了“发现客观真实”的诉讼真谛。但这种适用应当是审慎而规范的,包括:悬赏取证的启动须经受审法院作实质性审批,以彰显谦抑;悬赏的酬金由悬赏人自己决定,以确保效率;不论是否胜诉,悬赏金额均应由悬赏人自行承担,以避免悬赏取证被滥用。
[Abstract]:Reward evidence as a special means of providing evidence in civil litigation can effectively resolve the real problem of proof. The application of reward evidence in intellectual property infringement litigation is not only based on the need of balance between private rights and public interests. It is also in this kind of case facts because of the key evidence hiding difficult to find, strong technology, easy to be lost, and fall into the dilemma of truth and false unknown for the truth to find a new way. At the same time, it also reflects the true meaning of "discovering objective truth". However, this application should be prudent and standardized, including: the initiation of reward evidence must be subject to the substantive examination and approval of the court on trial in order to show modesty; The reward shall be determined by the reward person himself to ensure efficiency; Whether successful or not, the reward should be borne by the reward payer to avoid abuse of evidence.
【作者单位】：湘潭大学法学院;
【分类号】：DF72
【正文快照】： 悬赏在刑事诉讼(如悬赏通缉)与行政执法(如悬赏举报)领域极为常见,近年来在民事诉讼执行阶段亦不乏运用(如悬赏执行),但对其在民事证据收集上的应用,我国理论界与实务界的意见尚未达成统一。所谓悬赏取证,即诉讼当事人对赖以支持其权利主张的系争要件事实,以公开许诺物质报酬

【相似文献】