海峡两岸商事仲裁制度对比研究

发布时间：2018-02-04 16:34

本文关键词： 仲裁海峡两岸比较　出处：《河北法学》2013年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：仲裁(Arbitration),尤其是商事仲裁,作为一种争议解决方式,与诉讼、协商、调解等其他纠纷解决方式在一般层面上有相似之处,但是,仲裁更注重当事人的意思自治因素,而且仲裁具备强烈的民间性特征。海峡两岸的仲裁制度都已经施行了很长时间,随着社会的发展和进步,两岸的仲裁法律都有进一步提高和完善的空间。通过选取大陆与台湾地区仲裁法律制度中的典型规定包括仲裁协议、仲裁机构、仲裁程序以及裁决执行方面进行对比,试图总结出两岸之间以及与现行国际趋势间的不同点,以及未来仲裁法律制度进步的方向。
[Abstract]:Arbitration, especially commercial arbitration, as a method of dispute settlement, has some similarities with other dispute settlement methods, such as litigation, negotiation, mediation and so on, but. Arbitration pays more attention to the autonomy of the parties, and arbitration has strong folk characteristics. The arbitration system on both sides of the Taiwan Strait has been implemented for a long time, with the development and progress of society. There is room for further improvement and improvement of the arbitration laws on both sides of the strait. By selecting typical provisions in the arbitration legal system between the mainland and Taiwan including arbitration agreements and arbitration institutions. By comparing the arbitration procedure and the enforcement of the award, the author tries to sum up the differences between the two sides and between the two sides and the current international trend, as well as the direction of the future progress of the arbitration legal system.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.7
【正文快照】： 引言商事仲裁已经成为国际范围内解决商事争议的最优方式,其具有的专业性、快速性、便捷性、保密性、和谐性等优点,使其在众多的国际争议解决途径尤其是在商事领域中占有举足轻重的地位。中国大陆于1995年9月1日生效的《中华人民共和国仲裁法》以及台湾地区于1998年12月24日

【相似文献】