以引诱、欺骗方法讯问的合法化问题探讨

发布时间：2018-02-05 05:47

本文关键词： 引诱欺骗非法证据非法证据排除　出处：《江苏行政学院学报》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国立法对以引诱、欺骗方法讯问采取了泛道德化的否定立场,虽然立法对由此获取的供述网开一面,但这种否定立场仍强化了侦查讯问及至整个刑事司法的秘密化倾向,不利于对引诱、欺骗讯问方法进行合理规制。犯罪的本质决定了讯问方法的道德低标准性,以引诱、欺骗方法讯问具有一定的正当性,各国也在一定限度内赋予其合法性。我国应以不会引起虚假供述作为将引诱、欺骗讯问方法合法化的标准,并以对讯问全程录音录像、对律师开放讯问录音录像和在审查起诉、审判阶段谨慎审查犯罪嫌疑人、被告人认罪的自愿性作为配套措施。
[Abstract]:The legislation of our country has taken a general moral negation to the interrogation by the method of inducement and deception, although the legislation has made one side open to the confessions obtained therefrom. However, this negation still strengthens the secret tendency of investigation and interrogation and even the whole criminal justice, which is not conducive to the reasonable regulation of the methods of inducement and deceptive interrogation. The nature of the crime determines the moral substandard of the interrogation methods. Interrogation by enticement and deception has some legitimacy, and countries also give it legitimacy to a certain extent. Our country should take no false confession as the standard to legalize the method of luring and deceiving interrogation. It also takes the voluntary nature of the whole audiovisual recording of the interrogation, the opening of the audio and video recording of the interrogation to the lawyer and the examination of the prosecution, the careful examination of the suspect in the trial stage and the defendant's confession as the supporting measures.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D915.3
【正文快照】： 在生命、自由等重大利益面临威胁的情况下,如果一个人承认犯罪,那么供述极可能是真实的,以供述为基础进行的定罪一般不会出错。这是刑事司法中追求口供的基本动力源。虽然近些年不断有学者提出,我国刑事司法应从以口供为中心转向以物证为中心,但口供在我国刑事司法中仍具有不

【相似文献】