非法证据排除调查程序难以激活的原因与对策

发布时间：2018-02-07 14:57

本文关键词： 非法证据排除调查程序证明责任分配程序性诉权法官自由裁量权　出处：《政治与法律》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：尽管越来越多的被告人及其辩护人在审判过程中采取程序性辩护的策略,要求法庭排除控方非法证据,但是在非法证据排除规则缺乏完善的证明责任分配机制,以及辩护方的非法证据排除申请缺乏程序性诉权制约效果的情况下,非法证据排除调查程序往往因为法官滥用自由裁量权而难以被启动。为了激活非法证据排除调查程序,进而发挥非法证据排除规则的功能,不仅需要进一步明确界定辩护方的证明责任和提高辩护方的举证能力,而且应该从程序性诉权的角度来看待辩护方的非法证据排除申请和限制法官的自由裁量权。
[Abstract]:Although an increasing number of defendants and their defenders have adopted a procedural defence strategy in the course of the trial, requiring the court to exclude illegal evidence from the prosecution, there is a lack of a sound mechanism for the distribution of the burden of proof in the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. And if the defense's application for the exclusion of illegal evidence lacks the restrictive effect of procedural right of action, the procedure of unlawful evidence exclusion investigation is often difficult to initiate because of the judge's abuse of discretion. In order to activate the illegal evidence exclusion investigation procedure, In order to play the role of exclusionary rule of illegal evidence, it is not only necessary to define clearly the burden of proof of the defence, but also to improve the burden of proof of the defence. Moreover, the defense's illegal evidence exclusion application and the judge's discretion should be viewed from the point of view of procedural right of action.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：2011年度国家社科基金“刑事诉讼两个证据规定的实证考察与研究”(项目编号:11BFX127) 2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑事程序违法的定量分析”(项目编号:12YJA820069)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】