我国小额诉讼程序的适用探析

发布时间：2018-02-08 08:04

本文关键词： 小额诉讼低成本高效率程序选择权　出处：《太原科技大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2012年新修改的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》规定了小额诉讼程序，然而，我国立法对小额诉讼程序只规定了一个框架性的结构，仅概括性的规定了小额诉讼适用的标的额、管辖法院以及实行一审终审，限制上诉。小额诉讼程序所特有的起诉简便化、开庭时间便民化、庭审程序的简化、诉讼费用低廉等制度优势，，我国的立法并没有体现。仅有一条的法律规定略显单薄和笼统，具体程序规则的缺失无疑会导致司法实践中适用的混乱。我国小额诉讼程序是一种独立于简易程序并具有独立法律地位的诉讼程序，对普通民众的权力保护是小额诉讼制度的基础，通过简化诉讼程序、降低诉讼成本，为普通民众提供接近司法之机会。我国只是确立了小额诉讼程序，并没有建立完善的小额诉讼制度。一项制度的完善不可能一蹴而就，具体程序规则的缺失可以通过立法加以完善。因此，完善我国的小额诉讼程序，应当从我国当前小额诉讼程序实施的状况出发，结合我国小额诉讼程序立法和实践中存在的问题，明确规定小额诉讼的程序规则与具体的适用范围，在一审终审的基础上应当建立小额诉讼的救济程序，同时要赋予当事人程序选择权，以保障当事人享有充分的诉讼权利，真正实现司法的大众化。
[Abstract]:In 2012, the newly amended Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China provided for the small claims procedure. However, the legislation of our country only stipulated a frame structure for the small claims procedure, and only the amount of the subject matter applicable to the small amount litigation was generally stipulated. Jurisdiction of the court and the implementation of the final appeal of first instance, limitation of appeal. The advantages of the system such as simplicity of prosecution, convenience of court time, simplification of trial procedure, low cost of litigation, etc., are unique to small claims. The legislation of our country does not reflect. There is only one rule of law which is a little thin and general. The lack of specific rules of procedure will undoubtedly lead to confusion in judicial practice. The small claims procedure of our country is a kind of lawsuit procedure which is independent of the summary procedure and has the independent legal status. The protection of the power to the ordinary people is the foundation of the small amount litigation system. By simplifying the lawsuit procedure, the litigation cost is reduced. To provide the ordinary people with an opportunity to access to justice. Our country has only established a small claims procedure, and has not established a perfect small claims system. The perfection of a system cannot be achieved overnight. The lack of specific procedural rules can be improved by legislation. Therefore, in order to perfect the small claims procedure in China, we should proceed from the current situation of the implementation of the small claims procedure in our country. According to the problems existing in the legislation and practice of the small claims procedure in our country, the procedural rules and the specific scope of application of the small claims procedure should be clearly defined. On the basis of the final decision of the first instance, the relief procedure of the small claims procedure should be established. At the same time, the litigants should be given the right to choose the procedure, so as to guarantee the litigant to enjoy the full litigation right and realize the popularization of the judicature.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.18

【参考文献】