鉴定人出庭与专家辅助人角色定位之实证研究

发布时间：2018-02-09 16:38

本文关键词： 司法鉴定鉴定人出庭专家辅助人　出处：《法学研究》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新刑事诉讼法试图改变鉴定人出庭率低的现状,为此完善了鉴定意见审查规则;相应地,新确立的专家辅助人制度也被寄予厚望。从理论上看,保障被告方的对质权应成为上述改革的主要支点。但实证研究显示,鉴定人出庭率并没有因为新刑事诉讼法的实施而显著改善,鉴定人与法官对于鉴定人出庭都缺乏积极性;专家辅助人在法庭上的角色定位是模糊的,其在鉴定人、证人、辩护律师和其他独立的诉讼参与人等角色之间徘徊。应当围绕保障被告方的对质权来完善必要鉴定人出庭制度,在保留职权化和强调中立性的鉴定制度的同时,赋予专家辅助人意见以证据能力,以构建控辩平等的司法鉴定体系。
[Abstract]:The new Code of Criminal procedure tries to change the current situation of the low attendance rate of experts, thus perfecting the rules of examination of expert opinions; accordingly, the newly established system of expert auxiliaries is also highly expected. The protection of the defendant's right to pledge should be the main fulcrum of the above reform. However, the empirical research shows that the rate of experts appearing in court has not been significantly improved because of the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, and both the expert and the judge are lack of enthusiasm for the expert to appear in court. The role of expert auxiliaries in court is vague, and it lingers between experts, witnesses, defense lawyers and other independent litigant participants. The system of necessary experts appearing in court should be perfected around the protection of the defendant's right to pledge. While retaining the authority and emphasizing the neutral appraisal system, the expert assistant should be endowed with the evidence ability to construct the judicial expertise system of the equality of prosecution and defense.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;浙江大学司法鉴定中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“中国特色社会主义司法制度的模式、规律与改革方向研究”(14AKS009) 中国法学会部级课题“刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度实证研究”(CLS(2013)C83) 浙江省法学会课题“构建中国司法鉴定辅助人制度研究”(2013NA04)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】