影响性刑事个案判决书研究

发布时间：2018-02-10 14:41

本文关键词： 影响性刑事案件刑事判决书刑事判例制度　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：影响性诉讼在我国始于2005年由律师、学者们发起评选的“2005十大影响性诉讼”。“十大影响性诉讼”自2005年评选以来,每年都从全国成千上万的案件中选出对于我国的法治进程和社会发展最有影响力的十大案件。现在“影响性诉讼”这一词汇已由一个陌生词汇发展到成为了公共话语,关于影响性诉讼方面的新闻报道也越来越多。影响性判决书可以实现与民意的互动,对其他判决书也有示范作用,更可以对其他刑事案件判决产生影响,同时,对于民众具有法治普及和教化意义,通过个案的影响力甚至可以推动法治的进步。我国关于刑事判决书方面的研究比较多,但是对于影响性刑事个案方面入手分析的不多。笔者对于此题目的写作,主要分为三个部分:第一章是影响性刑事判决书的概述部分,主要是论述清楚影响性刑事案件的定义,以及关于影响性刑事判决书的研究意义。第二章是影响性刑事个案判决书的实证分析。案例主要选取了念斌案、张氏叔侄案、许霆案、大学生掏鸟窝案、陈传钧案、药家鑫案作为研究案例,对其判决书进行分析,主要从判决风格、判决说理、回应民意、回应辩护意见几个方面进行了分析,然后从个案中找出影响性刑事判决书的存在共性的价值,以期对于普通刑事判决书的完善有所帮助。第三章是基于影响性刑事个案判决对刑事判决书的不足之处进行分析并对于其完善提出个人建议,以期对于刑事判决书的改进有所助益。建议主要是从判决书说理、与民意互动、改进判决书僵化套路、法官专业素养、注重引用学理知识五个方面来进行论述的。最后一节从制度设计方面论证依据影响性刑事案件建立中国的刑事判例制度的可行性进行分析,这是从制度方面对完善我国刑事判决书以实现更高程度的司法公正所做的论述。
[Abstract]:The influential litigation in our country began in 2005, which was selected by lawyers and scholars as "the Top Ten influential Litigation in 2005." since 2005, the "Ten influential Litigation" has been selected since 2005. Every year, ten of the ten most influential cases are selected from thousands of cases in the country. Now the term "influential litigation" has developed from a strange word to a public discourse. There are also more and more news reports on influential litigation. Influential judgments can interact with public opinion, serve as a model for other judgements, and can also have an impact on other criminal judgements. At the same time, The populace has the significance of popularizing and educating the rule of law, and the influence of individual cases can even promote the progress of the rule of law. However, there is not much to analyze the influential criminal cases. The author mainly divides the writing of this topic into three parts: the first chapter is the summary of the influential criminal judgment, mainly discusses the definition of the criminal cases of influence. And the significance of the research on the influential criminal judgment. The second chapter is the empirical analysis of the judgment of the influential criminal case. The cases are mainly selected from the Niabin case, the Zhang's nephew case, the Xu Ting case, the university student's bird's nest case, and the Chen Chuanjun case. As a case study, the case of Yao Jiaxin was analyzed in terms of its judgment style, judgment reasoning, response to public opinion, and response to defense opinions. Then from the case to find out the value of the existence and commonality of the influential criminal judgment, The third chapter is to analyze the shortcomings of the criminal judgment based on the decision of the influential criminal case and put forward personal suggestions for its perfection. With a view to contributing to the improvement of the criminal judgment. The suggestions are mainly from the reasoning of the judgment, the interaction with public opinion, the improvement of the rigid routine of the judgment and the professional quality of the judge. The last section demonstrates the feasibility of establishing China's criminal precedent system based on influential criminal cases from the aspect of system design. This is from the system to perfect our criminal judgment to achieve a higher degree of judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】