作为组织的法院及其决策运作:司法职业保障的系统论考察

发布时间：2018-02-11 22:40

本文关键词： 司法职业保障法院系统理论组织决策　出处：《政治与法律》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法职业改革涉及法院组织结构调整问题。作为社会功能分化的产物,组织是一种产生决策并形成决策的自我指涉且吸收沟通中不确定性的系统。决策前提与决策的递归式演进构成了系统的双重封闭及其悖论。"禁止拒绝裁判"原则在法院组织中的构建解除了系统的悖论,从而成为法律系统的中心。对法官职业进行保障,必须将司法活动的规律与组织的决策逻辑结合在一起,也必须将法官审理知识的专业化、法官对组织的忠诚以及案件审理模式理解为作出正确司法决策的组织决策前提;"去行政化"的司法职业保障改革不应在否定法院组织权力结构这一决策前提的基础上展开。同样,作为组织决策问题,司法职业保障不能仅仅通过改革法官从业环境实现,还必须将律师在司法中的作用、全面深化改革以及党的领导等关乎司法决策的"前提"因素纳入考察的范围。对于具体的司法活动,应当确立的基本认知是,坚守法治并不意味着通过法律"行话"排斥社会情感与普通民众的法律认知。
[Abstract]:The reform of judicial profession involves the adjustment of the organizational structure of the court. Organization is a kind of system that produces and forms the decision-making self-reference and absorbs the uncertainty in communication. The recursive evolution of decision premise and decision constitutes the double closure of the system and its paradox. The construction in the court organization relieves the paradox of the system, In order to ensure the profession of judges, it is necessary to combine the law of judicial activities with the logic of decision making, and to professionalize the knowledge of judges. The loyalty of the judge to the organization and the trial mode of the case are understood as the premise of making the correct judicial decision. The reform of judicial occupational security should not be based on the premise of denying the power structure of the court organization. On a basic basis. Again, As a matter of organizational decision-making, judicial occupational security can not only be realized by reforming the working environment of judges, but also the role of lawyers in the administration of justice. The "premise" factors related to judicial decision-making, such as comprehensive deepening of reform and the leadership of the Party, are included in the scope of investigation. The basic cognition that should be established for specific judicial activities is:. Adherence to the rule of law does not mean rejecting social feelings and the legal cognition of ordinary people through legal jargon.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】