追求裁判的社会效果:1983—2012

发布时间：2018-02-11 22:14

本文关键词： 最高人民法院司法政策社会效果法治　出处：《法学研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在最高人民法院描绘的法治蓝图中,追求裁判的社会效果无疑是最具中国特色的司法政策之一。"社会效果"是最高人民法院在上世纪80年代初司法职能转型时期提出的概念,其含义随公共政策的变化而变化。最高人民法院创造这一弹性概念,旨在构建公共政策的司法转介机制,借此将党和国家的公共政策输送到司法审判过程。贯彻公共政策是最高人民法院的职能定位之一,但三十年的政策实践表明,最高法院的政策表达和下级法院的实践方法均亟待规范化。政策话语的严谨表达固然可减少误解,却无法化解裁判方法上的随意性和去法治化风险。这一问题的解决,必须在方法论上坚持法律教义与政策资源在司法裁判中的"体""用"格局,确保在法教义体系内进行政策权衡和结果判断。
[Abstract]:In the blueprint of the rule of law described by the Supreme people's Court, the pursuit of the social effect of adjudication is undoubtedly one of the most judicial policies with Chinese characteristics. "Social effect" is a concept put forward by the Supreme people's Court in the transition period of judicial function in early -20s. Its meaning changes with the change of public policy. The Supreme people's Court has created this flexible concept, which aims to construct a judicial referral mechanism for public policy. It is one of the functions of the Supreme people's Court to carry out the public policy of the Party and the State. However, 30 years of policy practice shows that, The policy expression of the Supreme Court and the practice method of the lower court should be standardized. The strict expression of the policy discourse can reduce misunderstandings, but it can not resolve the arbitrariness of the judgment method and the risk of the rule of law. We must adhere to the pattern of "body" and "use" of legal doctrine and policy resources in the judicial judgment in methodology, and ensure the policy balance and result judgment in the legal doctrine system.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;南京大学中德法学研究所;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】