不认罪案件诉讼程序研究

发布时间：2018-02-12 11:57

本文关键词： 不认罪隔离式量刑诉讼程序　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：从我国刑事诉讼法修改的历程可以看出，我国正在逐步完善抗辩式诉讼程序、从实体正义转向程序正义。在这样的大背景下，诉讼程序的简繁分流为合理、并且高效地解决各种类型的案件提供了可能。如有分流，那么不认罪案件的诉讼程序势必不能和认罪案件混为一谈，需要针对不认罪案件的特点进行单独设计，体现这类案件的复杂性。本文研究的目的就是提出一个专门适用于不认罪案件的诉讼程序。若想要设计的程序切实可行，必须要注重程序的实效性，若想收到良好的实效，则必须有针对性的构造程序，这样才能真正解决问题。而针对性要建立在全面把握这类案件实践特点的基础上，因此必须要走向实践。所以，，我在暑期进行了一个简单的调研，收集了一些相关数据，从数据信息的整合上进一步发掘出不认罪案件的特点。了解了这些特点，深度地挖掘问题，正确把脉问诊，才能做到对症下药。发现了问题，就要及时努力地去解决，而解决问题必先剖析问题。因此，结合我国司法实践，辅以理论分析，我进一步论证了在我国对不认罪案件单独构建程序的必要性与可行性，为程序的提出做好理论铺垫。解决问题必须全面、彻底。单纯地构思程序、设计程序并不难，但关键是如何使这一程序契合我国司法实践、使外国先进的制度溶入到我国法治的血液当中，真正做到洋为中用、不落窠臼，就需要结合我国法治国情、充分考虑各种可能出现的情况，需要进行周密的设计、详细的论证。考虑到刑事诉讼注重各阶段的衔接性，我将从侦查阶段开始，一直到审判完成，对各个阶段进行程序设计，以保障这一程序系统、全面。为了增强这一程序在我国的普适性，除了制度本身，我还充分考虑到可能需要的一些配套制度，作为补充完善。终于，我在实证研究基础上，通过借鉴相关学者的各种资料，进行吸收、消化、创新，形成了自己的观点。本文的亮点如下：首先，相对于认罪案件而言，对于诉讼分流的另一个大方向——不认罪类案件进行研究，选题具有一定的实际意义。其次，本文采用实证研究的方法，深入基层，获取了第一手资料，依靠数据进行论证，真实可靠。再次，在论文最后我提出了四个配套制度，数量虽不多，但其中的双方出庭制度、重新认罪制度是自己思考总结所得。
[Abstract]:From the course of the revision of our criminal procedure law, we can see that our country is gradually perfecting the adversarial litigation procedure, from substantive justice to procedural justice. And the efficient resolution of various types of cases offers the possibility. If there is a diversion, the proceedings in the case of not pleading guilty are bound not to be confused with the case of confession, and need to be separately designed for the characteristics of the case of not pleading guilty. The purpose of this paper is to put forward a procedure that is suitable for pleading guilty cases. If you want to design a program that is feasible, you must pay attention to the effectiveness of the program, if you want to receive good results, you must have a targeted construction program, This is the only way to really solve the problem. And pertinence should be based on a comprehensive understanding of the practical characteristics of such cases, so we must go to practice. So, I conducted a simple survey during the summer and collected some relevant data. From the integration of data information further explore the characteristics of non-guilty cases. Only when we understand these characteristics, dig the problems in depth, and correctly examine the pulse, can we get the right remedy for the case. When we find a problem, we must try our best to solve it in a timely manner, and we must first analyze the problem. Therefore, in combination with our country's judicial practice, In addition to the theoretical analysis, I further demonstrate the necessity and feasibility of constructing a separate procedure for pleading not guilty cases in our country, and pave the way for the presentation of the procedure. The solution to the problem must be comprehensive and thorough. It is not difficult to design a program simply. But the key is how to fit this procedure with the judicial practice of our country, and how to integrate advanced foreign systems into the blood of our country's rule of law. In order to truly use foreign goods as China and not to be stereotyped, it is necessary to fully consider all kinds of possible situations in the light of the national conditions of the rule of law in our country, and to carry out careful design and detailed argumentations, taking into account the fact that criminal proceedings pay attention to the convergence of various stages, From the investigation stage to the completion of the trial, I will design the procedures for each stage in order to guarantee this procedural system, comprehensive... In order to enhance the universality of this procedure in our country, except the system itself, I also fully take into account the possible need for some supporting system, as a supplement to improve. Finally, on the basis of empirical research, I absorb, digest, innovate and form my own viewpoint by drawing on various materials from relevant scholars. The highlights of this paper are as follows: first, compared with the case of confession, It is of certain practical significance to study the non-guilty cases, another major direction of the diversion of litigation. Secondly, this paper adopts the method of empirical research to go deep into the grassroots, obtain first-hand information, and rely on data for demonstration. Thirdly, at the end of the paper, I put forward four supporting systems, although the number is not much, but the two parties appear in court system, replete guilty system is their own thinking summary.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】