我国死刑案件审级制度研究

发布时间：2018-02-15 00:28

本文关键词： 死刑案件审级制度死刑复核三审终审　出处：《广西民族大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：死刑是对犯罪人实行的最为严厉的刑种，具有不可恢复性。但受制于各方原因，我国现阶段还不能废除死刑，所以，在立法层面对死刑案件审级制度的设计具有极高的要求。在刑事诉讼程序中，死刑复核程序是独有的特殊程序，它是我国两审终审制度的例外，但是该程序的运行在实践中呈现出流于形式的特点，使其预期功能无法实现。在废除死刑、严格控制死刑的国际背景下，我国应对死刑的妥善方案是以正当的死刑程序保证死刑裁判的正当性，以确保严格适用死刑，即改革目前的审级制度，将死刑案件由两审终审改为三审终审，以第三审普通审取代死刑复核程序。这样可以合理配置各诉讼主体和司法主体的诉讼与司法职能，在审级内部强化各审判组织和审判环节的责任，又在外部引入辩护职能和检察职能对死刑程序运行的制约和监督，把实践中名存实亡的死刑复核程序转化为独立的审判程序，从而确保通过程序公正实现量刑公正。论文主要分为四个部分，对死刑案件审级制度进行深入研究。第一章对案件的审级制度进行基本的概述，，阐明审级制度的概念、价值、类型、功能，和较具代表性国家的审级制度。第二章结合我国现在的刑事立法规定，揭示当前死刑案件审级制度存在的各种问题，为下文的深入研究做必要的铺垫。第三章集中论述当前死刑案件审级制度重构的必要性。第四章提出我国死刑案件审级制度改革的出路，即通过确立三审终审制度来克服死刑复核程序存在的种种问题，使我国死刑案件的处理质量逐步提升，并提出设置第三审程序的具体建议。
[Abstract]:The death penalty is the most severe type of punishment against the criminal, which is not recoverable. However, because of the reasons of all parties, our country can not abolish the death penalty at the present stage, so, In the aspect of legislation, the design of the trial level system of death penalty cases is very high. In the criminal procedure, the death penalty review procedure is a unique special procedure, which is the exception of the final appeal system of the second instance in our country. However, the operation of the program has become a mere formality in practice, which makes its expected function impossible to realize. In the international context of abolishing the death penalty and strictly controlling the death penalty, The proper plan of our country to deal with the death penalty is to guarantee the legitimacy of the death penalty judgment with due process of death penalty, in order to ensure the strict application of the death penalty, that is, to reform the current trial level system, and to change the death penalty case from the second instance to the third instance. To replace the death penalty review procedure with the third instance ordinary trial. In this way, the litigation and judicial functions of each main body of litigation and the judicial subject can be reasonably allocated, and the responsibilities of each trial organization and trial link can be strengthened within the trial level. Furthermore, it introduces the restriction and supervision of the defense function and the procuratorial function on the operation of the death penalty procedure, and transforms the death penalty review procedure into an independent trial procedure. So as to ensure the realization of sentencing justice through procedural justice. The paper is divided into four parts, in-depth study of the death penalty trial system. The first chapter gives a basic overview of the trial system of the case, clarifies the concept and value of the trial level system. Type, function, and the trial level system in representative countries. Chapter two, combined with the current criminal legislation in our country, reveals the various problems existing in the current system of trial of death penalty cases. The third chapter focuses on the necessity of reconstructing the trial level system of death penalty cases. Chapter 4th puts forward the way out of the reform of the death penalty trial level system in our country. That is, by establishing the third instance final appeal system to overcome the problems existing in the death penalty review procedure, to gradually improve the quality of the handling of death penalty cases in China, and put forward concrete suggestions for setting up the third instance procedure.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】