论被害人权利谱系

发布时间：2018-02-16 00:10

本文关键词： 被害人复仇权利谱系　出处：《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：被害人权利伴随着历史的发展和人类的进步被逐步发现、揭示、赋予,因而具有历史传承性。初民社会的被害人权利依其自然本性体现为私力复仇,及至国家出现,公权力以积极姿态介入两造纠葛之后,由国家暴力保证实施的酷刑成为私力复仇制度化的替代品。酷刑制度化实施存在包括滥用公权、践踏人权等种种弊端,这在思想启蒙时代引发了强烈批判,表现在刑事法领域即刑罚人道主义思潮,当以被告人权利为立论基础的刑罚人道主义盛行于司法实践中时,被害人以复仇为基底的权利便丧失殆尽,被害人从此长期处于失语、失权状态。现代司法文明不应当忽视任何一方的权利,应该在无损司法权威的前提下确保任何一方的诉求得到顺畅表达和获得应有尊重与回应,在被害人层面上,便要求应以被害人的表达权为核心重构其权利体系。
[Abstract]:Along with the development of history and the progress of human beings, the rights of victims are gradually discovered, revealed, endowed, and thus have historical inheritance. The victims' rights of the early civil society are reflected in their natural nature as private revenge, until the emergence of the country. After the public power intervened in the two disputes in a positive manner, the torture guaranteed by state violence became a substitute for the institutionalization of private revenge. The institutionalization of torture included abuse of public power and violation of human rights, and so on. This led to a strong criticism in the age of ideological enlightenment, which was manifested in the field of criminal law, that is, the trend of thought of humanitarianism of punishment. When the criminal humanitarianism based on the rights of the accused prevailed in judicial practice, The victim's right based on revenge has been lost, and the victim has been in a state of aphasia for a long time. The modern judicial civilization should not ignore the rights of any party, Without prejudice to judicial authority, we should ensure that the demands of any party are expressed smoothly and receive due respect and response. At the level of victims, we should take the right of expression of the victims as the core to reconstruct their right system.
【作者单位】：河南师范大学法学院;
【基金】：河南省社会科学规划项目(2013BFX024)
【分类号】：D915.3

【参考文献】