L省刑事自诉案件运行情况实证研究

发布时间：2018-02-21 21:37

本文关键词： 自诉实证调查实验调解撤诉和解　出处：《辽宁大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在现代社会中,各国的自诉制度都呈现一种式弱的趋势,这种衰微已经是一个不争的事实,与此同时,由于自诉的某些特征并不能完全被公诉完全取代,因此自诉制度在相当长的一段历史时期内还有不可替代性,至少现在还没要找到合适的公诉自诉对接的方式,作为一种保护被害人合法权益的需要,自诉权利的行使主体是被害人,他们因为他人的侵犯行为,导致了生理心理上诸多方面的受害,有权利追求对施害者的惩罚,公诉强调的是一种对整体利益的保护而自诉更强调对个体权益个体正义的维护,同时自诉作为对公诉权以及公诉制度的一种补充,其监督和制约作用凸显,检察官作为国家追诉犯罪的代表,其自身与案件并无利害关系,可能会在某些原因某些情况下怠于行使相关权力,而且由于所处的地位的不同,检察人员多关注群体与社会利益,对于个体当事人的关注较少。因此给予被害人更多自我救济的途径对于实现司法的公平正义有重要意义。加之,公诉权本身是一种官僚权利,可能在行使过程中难免机械死板形式主义,以自诉制度加以补充,能起到灵活应对复杂多变的客观情况的需要。然而我们还必须看到现今的自诉制度还有待完善,欲将保护公民权利充分行使的重任完整实现,还需要立法与实践的变革,本文欲通过一系列实证调研的数据来反应实践中自诉制度运行的特点,经由这些数据所表现的情形,探究如何能在立法层面进行变革,使该制度能更好发挥其应有的效能,通过对刑事自诉案件受案情况,刑事自诉案件的类型,结案方式、结案情况,自诉人的举证情况,自诉案件审理情况包括审限、审理方式等多角度,多数据的分析,力求真实还原刑事自诉制度的总体运行样貌,找到自诉制度设立所倡导的价值导向与实际操作间的差异,进而完善刑事自诉制度。受篇幅和研究能力的限制,笔者仅提出了几点与所调研数据相关的立法建议,包括针对自诉人举证能力弱而提出的立案标准的放宽以及公权力协助机制,针对第三类自诉案件在实践中极少适用建议立法取消第三类自诉案件,针对实际中自诉案件审限较长提出进一步规定自诉案件自己的独有的审限等,希望通过笔者的辛勤努力,能够取得抛砖引玉的作用,让自诉制度这个颇有历史韵味的制度更能在运行中更充分发挥保护公民权利的作用。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the private prosecution system of all countries presents a kind of weak trend, this decline has been an indisputable fact, at the same time, because some characteristics of private prosecution can not be completely replaced by public prosecution. Therefore, the private prosecution system has been irreplaceable for quite a long period of time, at least not yet to find a suitable way of docking public prosecution, as a need to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the victims. The main body of the exercise of the right of private prosecution is the victim, and they have the right to pursue the punishment of the perpetrator because of the violation of others, resulting in many aspects of physical and psychological victimization. Public prosecution emphasizes the protection of the whole interests and private prosecution emphasizes the individual justice of individual rights and interests. At the same time, as a supplement to the public prosecution right and the public prosecution system, its supervision and restriction function is prominent. The prosecutor, as the representative of the State for prosecution of crimes, has no interest in the case itself and may, for some reason or other, be reluctant to exercise the relevant powers, and because of its different status, The procurator pays more attention to the interests of the group and the society, and pays less attention to the individual party. Therefore, it is of great significance to give more self-relief to the victim to realize the justice of justice. In addition, the right of public prosecution is a kind of bureaucratic right. It is possible that mechanically rigid formalism will inevitably occur in the course of exercise, supplemented by the private prosecution system, which can respond flexibly to the complex and changeable objective situation. However, we must also see that the present system of private prosecution still needs to be improved. In order to realize the task of protecting citizens' rights fully, we still need the reform of legislation and practice. This paper attempts to reflect the characteristics of the private prosecution system in practice through a series of empirical data, and through these data, we want to reflect the situation. To explore how to reform the system at the legislative level so that the system can better play its due effectiveness, through the criminal private prosecution cases, the types of criminal private prosecution cases, the way to close the case, the circumstances of the case, the case of private prosecution, The trial situation of private prosecution cases includes trial limit, trial method and so on, and the analysis of multi-data, in order to truly restore the overall operating appearance of the criminal private prosecution system, and find the difference between the value orientation advocated by the establishment of the private prosecution system and the actual operation. And then perfect the criminal private prosecution system. Limited by space and research ability, the author only put forward a few legislative suggestions related to the investigated data. Including the relaxation of filing standards and the mechanism of public power assistance for the weak ability of proof of private prosecution. In view of the third type of private prosecution cases rarely applied in practice, it is suggested that legislation should be applied to cancel the third category of private prosecution cases. In view of the longer trial limit of private prosecution cases in practice, it is hoped that through the author's hard work, the author will be able to make a contribution to the trial of private prosecution cases by further stipulating their own unique limits of adjudication. Let the private prosecution system, which has historical appeal, play the role of protecting the civil rights more fully in the operation.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】