我国死刑量刑程序改革渐进之路
发布时间:2018-02-26 00:24
本文关键词: 量刑程序 弊端 改革 渐进之路 出处:《法学杂志》2013年11期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:我国《刑事诉讼法》第193条规定了量刑程序,使量刑有了基本法律依据,但对于死刑案件,却远远不能满足量刑公平公正需求,引发了诸多弊端,导致法官量刑随意,甚或司法腐败,影响了司法公信力。其成因极为复杂,有理念与需求矛盾,也有制度与执行冲突。死刑案件量刑程序改革势在必行,在考量现实需求和改革难易程度的前提下,应分步实施,走适合我国司法实际的改革之路。
[Abstract]:Article 193 of our country's Criminal procedure Law stipulates the sentencing procedure, which makes the sentencing have the basic legal basis, but for the death penalty cases, it is far from meeting the demand of sentencing fairness and justice, which leads to a lot of malpractices, which leads to the judge's discretion in sentencing. Even judicial corruption affects judicial credibility. Its causes are extremely complicated, there are contradictions between ideas and needs, and there are also conflicts between system and execution. The reform of sentencing procedures in death penalty cases is imperative. Under the premise of considering the actual needs and the degree of difficulty of reform, Should carry out step by step, take the reform road that suits our country judicial reality.
【作者单位】: 山东政法学院经济贸易法学院;
【基金】:作者主持的山东省社会科学规划研究项目“判例法律地位与司法公正问题研究”(批准号:08CFXJ09)的研究成果之一
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 陈卫东;李训虎;;分而治之:一种完善死刑案件证明标准的思路[J];人民检察;2007年08期
2 程进飞;;美国死刑量刑程序对我国的启示[J];郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 耿春霞;黄U,
本文编号:1535784
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1535784.html