民事诉讼争议焦点整理制度研究
发布时间:2018-02-26 05:26
本文关键词: 民事诉讼争议焦点整理 审理前的准备阶段 民事庭前会议 民事证据交换 民事证据失权 出处:《内蒙古大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:在不断地改革与探索中,民事诉讼争议焦点整理制度作为民事诉讼审前程序的核心,已经受到许多国家和地区的广泛重视。得益于完善的民事诉讼争议焦点整理制度,德国、法国等大陆法系国家和英国、美国等英美法系国家甚至日本的民事审前程序之完备程度已经跻身世界前列。然而,缘于历史、社会、法律文化等的差异,我国民事诉讼法在立法上缺乏步骤性与细致性的规定;在司法实践中,审前程序也缺乏切实的准备工作,法官没有召集当事人在审理前固定民事诉讼争议焦点的习惯,总是把对民事诉讼争议焦点的整理工作视为证据交换的附庸。直到2015年2月4日《最高人民法院关于适用(中华人民共和国民事诉讼法的解释》的施行,才体现出民事诉讼中争议焦点整理的重要性。本文从民事诉讼争议焦点整理的概念入手,与域外的民事诉讼争议焦点整理进行比较研究,在对我国民事诉讼争议焦点整理的立法和司法现状进行剖析的基础上,结合民事诉讼法的修订和2015年《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国民事诉讼法的解释》的最新规定,提出了进一步完善我国民事诉讼争议焦点整理的建议,以期对民事诉讼程序立法的进一步完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In the process of continuous reform and exploration, as the core of the civil litigation pretrial procedure, the civil litigation dispute focus arrangement system has been paid extensive attention by many countries and regions, thanks to the perfect civil litigation dispute focus arrangement system, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany, Germany. The degree of completeness of civil pretrial procedures in countries with civil law systems such as France and the United Kingdom, the United States and even Japan has been among the highest in the world. However, due to differences in history, society, and legal culture, China's civil procedure law lacks the provisions of step and detail in legislation, and in judicial practice, the pretrial procedure also lacks practical preparation work, and the judge does not summon the parties to fix the focus of civil litigation disputes before the trial. The collation of the focal points of civil litigation is always regarded as an attachment to the exchange of evidence. Until February 4th 2015, the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China), This article starts with the concept of civil litigation dispute focus arrangement, and carries on the comparative research with the foreign civil litigation dispute focus arrangement. On the basis of an analysis of the legislative and judicial status quo of the focus of civil litigation disputes in China, combined with the revision of the Civil procedure Law and the latest provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China in 2015, The author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the focus of civil litigation in order to improve the legislation of civil procedure.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 王利明;民事证据规则司法解释若干问题研究[J];法学;2004年01期
2 宋春雨;;新《民事诉讼法》中有关证据制度理解和适用的几个问题[J];法律适用;2013年10期
3 黄俊;;论民事诉讼证据失权[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年12期
4 张自合;;论已决事实的预决效力——以台湾地区争点效的要件为借鉴[J];山东警察学院学报;2011年05期
5 赵泽君;;民事争点整理程序的合理性基础及其建构[J];现代法学;2008年02期
6 刘万洪;;民事审理的集中化研究——以庭审程序为中心[J];现代法学;2011年04期
7 赵旭东;;民事诉讼第一审的功能审视与价值体现[J];中国法学;2011年03期
8 李浩;;民事证据制度的再修订[J];中外法学;2013年01期
9 杨亚南;;民事诉讼证据失权制度刍探[J];现代妇女(下旬);2014年07期
,本文编号:1536708
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1536708.html