当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

行政不作为诉讼研究

发布时间:2018-03-02 11:23

  本文选题:行政不作为 切入点:行政诉讼 出处:《湘潭大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:当前,行政不作为诉讼已经成为整个行政诉讼案件中一个重要的部分,但是由于立法等方面的原因,我国行政不作为诉讼制度还仍需进一步讨论和研究。对于行政不作为诉讼,现行的法律对其规定过于原则性,可操作部分并不多,这些笼统的规定目前已经难以适应行政司法实务和我国法治社会的需求。笔者将本文分为四个部分,以我国现阶段发展相对完善的行政作为诉讼为基础,结合我国目前行政不作为司法实务中所面临的问题,进行了研究分析。在第一个模块中,首先笔者将行政不作为的出现划分为理论基础和现实基础,在理论基础部分对行政不作为提出三个理论问题,通过对三个理论问题的深入探讨,对我国现实情况下的行政不作为的内涵和外延进行的了界定,提出了自己对行政领域不作为行为该如何定义。在现实基础方面,笔者主要讨论了行政给付理论、公民权理论和国家赔偿理论,这些理论的产生于发展作为行政不作为诉讼的基础,使得行政不作为诉讼救济手段真正成为维护行政相对人合法权益的有效手段。正是有这些基础理论的存在,我国才将行政不作为诉讼引入到行政诉讼程序当中来,并且使诉讼手段成为解决行政不作为行为的途径。第二部分主要是从行政机关和相对人的角度,提出了我国为何能够产生行政不作为诉讼救济途径,并且对行政不作为诉讼的两大功能进行的分析。第三部分笔者从两个方面分析和研究了现阶段我国行政不作为所能够所存在的立法问题和司法实践问题。另一方面司法实践操作中由于没有较为详细的可操作性规定,各地行政不作为诉讼所呈现出来的问题既有共同性又有独特性。第四部分是本文的重点章节,该章节以前三章所讨论出的我国行政不作为诉讼领域中所呈现出来的问题为基础,在这些问题上进行分析,提出了笔者自己的完善思路,由于我国行政诉讼目前面临问题较为纷杂,笔者认为当前,我国行政不作为诉讼立法主要应该:一、扩大法益保护的范围;二、进一步明确起诉期限;三、构建我国公益行政诉讼。在外部环境方面,笔者则建议树立开放的行政法治精神和树立多元化解决行政不作为理念。笔者在本文中通过对我国当前行政诉讼中存在的问题进行深入剖析,提出了自己的解决途径。
[Abstract]:At present, administrative omission litigation has become an important part of the whole administrative litigation case. However, due to the reasons of legislation and other aspects, the administrative omission litigation system of our country still needs further discussion and study. The current law is too principled for its provisions, the operational part is not many, these general provisions have been difficult to meet the needs of the practice of administrative justice and the rule of law society. On the basis of our country's relatively perfect administrative litigation at the present stage, combined with the problems faced in the judicial practice of administrative omission in our country at present, this paper has carried on the research and analysis. In the first module, First of all, the author divides the appearance of administrative omission into theoretical basis and practical basis. In the theoretical basis part, the author puts forward three theoretical problems of administrative omission, and probes into the three theoretical problems deeply. This paper defines the connotation and extension of administrative omission in our country, and puts forward its own definition of administrative omission. On the basis of reality, the author mainly discusses the theory of administrative payment. The theory of citizenship and the theory of state compensation, which came into being as the basis of administrative omission litigation, Making the remedy means of administrative omission litigation really become an effective means to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart. It is precisely with the existence of these basic theories that our country introduces administrative omission litigation into the administrative litigation procedure. The second part is mainly from the point of view of administrative organs and relative parties, put forward why our country can produce administrative omission litigation relief way. In the third part, the author analyzes and studies the legislative problems and the judicial practice problems which can exist in the administrative omission litigation in our country at the present stage. Due to the lack of detailed operational provisions in judicial practice, The problems presented in the litigation of administrative omission in various places are both common and unique. Part 4th is the key chapter of this article, and the problems in the field of litigation of administrative omission in China discussed in the previous three chapters of this chapter are based on them. This paper analyzes these problems and puts forward the author's own ideas of perfection. As the administrative litigation in our country is faced with various problems at present, the author thinks that at present, the legislation of administrative omission litigation in our country should mainly be: 1. Expand the scope of legal interest protection; second, further clarify the time limit for prosecution; third, construct our public interest administrative litigation. In terms of external environment, The author suggests to set up the spirit of open administrative rule of law and the idea of pluralistic solution to administrative omission. In this paper, the author puts forward his own solution by deeply analyzing the problems existing in the current administrative litigation in our country.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D922.1

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 韩伟;张忠杰;;NGN时代IP承载网的构建[J];中国新通信;2017年06期

2 李铭超;何岩;;基于BFD的IPRAN路由器快速切换功能[J];计算机与现代化;2017年02期

3 伍思廉;;一种基于BFD检测的IP快速重路由解决策略[J];信息通信;2016年07期

4 邓嘉;吉萌;雷升平;;基于多核处理器BFD协议的设计与实现[J];电子设计工程;2016年12期

5 于少山;黄建军;薛亮;;人行业务网省域网纵向扁平化研究[J];金融科技时代;2016年06期

6 秦少臻;;基于NGN背景的IP承载网构建研究[J];电子世界;2016年10期

7 王坦;仝磊;郭学义;张亚龙;;基于BFD检测的静态路由切换研究[J];自动化技术与应用;2015年08期

8 李乃振;李朝东;刘继光;;BFD技术在提高专网可靠性中的应用[J];工业仪表与自动化装置;2015年02期

9 秦艺力;张潇男;唐淼;;通信专网关键信息自动切换路由设计[J];计算机与网络;2013年24期

10 张宗明;;IP承载网BFD应用研究[J];无线互联科技;2013年09期



本文编号:1556311

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1556311.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5d4eb***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com