侦查诉讼化模式再解读及其制度逻辑

发布时间：2018-03-03 10:45

本文选题：侦查模式　切入点：诉讼化　出处：《法学杂志》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国审问型侦查模式具有重大缺陷,尤其在以审判为中心的改革背景下其弊端愈加突出,该模式不仅难以保证侦查权的规范行使,也无法满足侦查监督与保障人权的要求。司法权介入侦查、辩护权制约侦查权的精神是侦查诉讼化,构成当前刑事诉讼制度改革的一项重大创新。侦查诉讼化模式中的权力顶点是裁判权,而非侦查权或检察权。侦控面向的司法改革以及认罪认罚从宽的制度实施与侦查诉讼化存在必然联系。对此,我国应该在借鉴域外成熟经验的基础上,从建立司法审查制度、扩大犯罪嫌疑人的程序性权利、完善协作制约型检警关系等方面对现行侦查模式进行适度的诉讼化改造。
[Abstract]:China's interrogation investigation model has great defects, especially in the context of the trial as the center of the reform of its more prominent drawbacks, this model is not only difficult to ensure the normative exercise of investigative power. It is also unable to meet the requirements of investigation supervision and protection of human rights. The spirit of judicial intervention in investigation and the right of defense to restrict the right to investigate is to investigate and litigate. A major innovation in the reform of the current criminal procedure system. The apex of the power in the mode of investigation litigation is the power of adjudication. Instead of investigating power or procuratorial power, the judicial reform oriented to investigation and prosecution, and the implementation of lenient system of guilty and punishment are inevitably related to the investigation litigation. Therefore, our country should establish the judicial review system on the basis of the mature experience of foreign countries. Expanding the procedural rights of criminal suspects and perfecting the cooperative and restricted relationship between procurators and police, the author tries to reform the current investigation mode in a proper way.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部社会治理法治建设创新团队发展计划项目(项目编号:IRT1310)支持
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】