刑事被追诉人阅卷制度探究

发布时间：2018-03-04 00:00

本文选题：被追诉人　切入点：阅卷权　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：毋庸置疑，被追诉人权利保障是刑事诉讼理论研究中恒久不衰的话题。可以说，被追诉人权利范围不断扩大、保障机制逐渐完善的过程其实就是刑事诉讼不断演进的过程。在被追诉人程序主体地位不断提高的今天，各国刑事诉讼均承认被追诉人是享有一系列诉讼权利的主体，并纷纷赋予被追诉人诉讼权利。那么，专属于被追诉人的阅卷权也应被赋予。被追诉人阅卷权是指在刑事诉讼中，被追诉人本人依法享有查阅案卷材料以便及时了解案情的权利。案卷在刑事诉讼中之所以重要是因为它可以起到记载诉讼进行情况、固定相关材料的作用，也对形成案卷材料的诉讼机关具有一定的约束作用。通过查阅案卷材料，被追诉人可以及时、全面了解案件情况，提前做好抗辩准备；对案件证据进行审查，可以发现对其指控中可能存在的疑点和问题，有效地形成辩护意见。赋予被追诉人阅卷权，，不仅是控辩双方平等对抗的体现，也是保障被追诉人获得实体公正判决的前提。因此，探究如何构建我国刑事被追诉人阅卷制度具有重要意义。本文分为五章，从论述被追诉人阅卷权的概念、归属和其正当性开始，接着从我国确立被追诉人阅卷权的必要性及可行性出发，提出了建立我国刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的具体构想。第一章：刑事被追诉人阅卷权的内涵界定。首先阐述了刑事被追诉人阅卷权的概念和特点，之后详细介绍了有关我国阅卷权归属的争论，接着是确立刑事被追诉人阅卷权正当性的分析，为下文作好铺垫。第二章：我国刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的立法现状与分析。这一章先介绍了《刑事诉讼法》及司法解释中有关于阅卷权的规定，指出了目前立法的不足。然后，客观分析了确立刑事被追诉人阅卷权后可能会引起的消极后果。第三章：刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的域外考察。本文选择了德国、我国台湾地区在刑事被追诉人阅卷制度上这两个较为典型的代表，从刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的设置条件、范围、时间、地点等方面进行了阐述，并对域外刑事被追诉人阅卷制度作了简要的评析，从而为建立我国刑事被追诉人阅卷制度提供有益的借鉴。第四章：我国确立刑事被追诉人阅卷权的必要性与可行性。本章从五个方面论述了确立刑事被追诉人阅卷权的必要性，并从立法、现实、物质这三角度分析了建立刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的可行性。第五章：我国刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的构建。在前文的基础上，本章从刑事被追诉人阅卷制度的原则、设置条件、范围、方式、地点、救济途径、配套措施对我国刑事被追诉人阅卷制度进行了具体设置。
[Abstract]:There is no doubt that the protection of the rights of the accused is an everlasting topic in the theoretical study of criminal proceedings. It can be said that the scope of the right of the prosecuted person is constantly expanding. The process of the gradual perfection of the safeguard mechanism is in fact the process of the continuous evolution of the criminal procedure. With the continuous improvement of the subject status of the proceedings of the accused, criminal proceedings in various countries have recognized that the accused person is the subject of a series of litigation rights. And one after another, the litigant should be given the right to judge the papers, which belongs exclusively to the accused. The right of the accused to read the papers refers to the right to read the papers in the criminal proceedings. The accused person himself has the right to consult the file materials in order to understand the facts of the case in a timely manner. The reason why the case file is important in the criminal proceedings is that it can serve as a record of the proceedings and fix the relevant materials. By consulting the file materials, the accused person can understand the case situation in a timely manner, fully understand the case, prepare for the defense in advance, and examine the evidence of the case. We can find the possible doubts and problems in the charges, and effectively form the defense opinion. Giving the accused the right to read papers is not only the embodiment of the equal confrontation between the prosecution and the defense, Therefore, it is of great significance to explore how to construct the system of criminal prosecution marking in our country. This paper is divided into five chapters, beginning with the concept, attribution and legitimacy of the right of the accused, and then starting from the necessity and feasibility of establishing the right of the defendant to read the paper in our country. This paper puts forward the concrete conception of establishing the system of the criminal prosecution record marking in our country. The first chapter: the definition of the criminal prosecution's right to read papers. Firstly, it expounds the concept and characteristics of the criminal prosecution's right to read papers, and then introduces the debate about the ownership of the right of marking in our country in detail. Then it is the analysis of the legitimacy of the criminal prosecution's marking right, which lays the groundwork for the following. Chapter two: the present situation and analysis of the criminal prosecution marking system in our country. This chapter first introduces the provisions of the Criminal procedure Law and the judicial interpretation about the marking right, and points out the deficiency of the current legislation. This paper objectively analyzes the possible negative consequences of the establishment of the criminal prosecution's right to read papers. The third chapter: the foreign investigation of the criminal prosecution marking system. This paper chooses Germany and Taiwan as the two more typical representatives of the criminal prosecution marking system, from the setting conditions of the criminal prosecution marking system. This paper expounds the scope, time, place and so on, and makes a brief comment on the marking system of foreign criminal indictees, so as to provide a useful reference for the establishment of our country's criminal prosecution record marking system. Chapter 4th: the necessity and feasibility of establishing the right of the criminal prosecution to read the papers. This chapter discusses the necessity of establishing the right of the criminal prosecution from five aspects, and from the legislation, reality, This article analyzes the feasibility of setting up the system of the criminal prosecution's examination paper from these three angles. Chapter 5th: the construction of Chinese criminal prosecution marking system. On the basis of the above, this chapter starts with the principles, setting conditions, scope, methods, locations, and remedies of the system. Supporting measures of our country's criminal prosecution for the marking system of specific settings.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】