美国司法裁判理论重构——塔玛纳哈均衡现实主义理论述评

发布时间：2018-03-04 03:12

本文选题：司法裁判理论　切入点：法律形式主义　出处：《法学杂志》2013年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法裁判理论是美国法理学核心问题之一。其中,法律形式主义与法律现实主义的争执贯穿始终、交替登台。塔玛纳哈则否认在美国存在法律形式主义时期,并试图纠正将法律现实主义归结为极端规则怀疑主义的传统认识。在此基础上,他提出了"司法裁判均衡现实主义"理论,将规则约束与规则怀疑作为其均衡现实主义的两个基点,不仅试图重塑法律现实主义的形象,而且要重构司法裁判理论。
[Abstract]:The theory of judicial adjudication is one of the core issues of American jurisprudence. Among them, the dispute between legal formalism and legal realism runs through all the time, and alternately comes on stage. Tamanaha denies the existence of legal formalism in the United States. On the basis of this, he puts forward the theory of "balanced realism of judicial adjudication", and tries to correct the traditional understanding that legal realism is reduced to extreme rule skepticism. Taking rule constraint and rule doubt as the two basic points of equilibrium realism, not only trying to reconstruct the image of legal realism, but also reconstructing the theory of judicial judgment.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD916

【相似文献】