我国民事速裁程序研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 03:32

本文选题：民事速裁　切入点：民事审判程序　出处：《内蒙古大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法审判资源的匮乏和民商事案件爆炸性增长的矛盾,是当前我国司法审判所面临的典型矛盾之一。在这种矛盾的影响下,人民法院的审判工作也承受着巨大的压力,仅利用传统审判模式已经难以满足实际需求。为了缓解这一矛盾,改革现行的民事审判方式从而提高审判效率,在我国民事司法实践中施行简易快速裁判,即所谓的“民事速裁”,成为了解决这一矛盾的举措之一,民事速裁程序的应用也成为了我国民事司法审判实践的必然选择。本文通过运用文献研究法、实证分析法、对比分析法以及归纳总结法等,对当前我国民事速裁程序进行了必要分析。文章首先介绍的是民事速裁程序的基本概念和性质,初步了解了速裁在我国民事诉讼法中的定位。通过对民事速裁的特征与设置原理的分析,认识到了设置民事速裁程序的必要性。指出该程序同简易、小额程序之间的关系,进一步明确该程序存在的合理性；其次,本文对当前域外两大法系民事速裁的相关规定进行了考察分析,同时归纳其特点并以资借鉴；接着,本文对我国目前民事速裁程序的现状及运行情况进行了考察。通过考察发现,我国实践中的民事速裁程序存在着程序定位不清,当事人程序选择权有待保障以及我国民事速裁程序同非速裁程序转换衔接机制尚不健全等一系列问题。本文认为,为了解决上述问题,首先要从立法层面给予民事速裁程序合理定位,其次要从适用范围和审级这两方面保证当事人的程序选择权,最后是要进一步实现科学高效地程序转换与衔接机制。本文研究的主要目的是能够使人们对我国民事速裁程序有更加深刻地认识,通过完善民事速裁程序促使我国民事司法审判效率得以提升。
[Abstract]:The contradiction between the scarcity of judicial resources and the explosive growth of civil and commercial cases is one of the typical contradictions facing the judicial trial in our country at present. Under the influence of this contradiction, the trial work of the people's court is also under great pressure. It is difficult to satisfy the actual demand only by using the traditional trial mode. In order to alleviate this contradiction, to reform the current civil trial mode and to improve the trial efficiency, to implement the simple and fast judgment in the civil judicial practice of our country. The so-called "civil quick adjudication" has become one of the measures to solve this contradiction, and the application of civil adjudication procedure has become an inevitable choice in our country's civil judicial practice. In this paper, the author makes a necessary analysis of the civil quick adjudication procedure in our country by means of comparative analysis and inductive summing method. Firstly, this paper introduces the basic concept and nature of the civil quick adjudication procedure. This paper preliminarily understands the orientation of quick adjudication in the civil procedure law of our country. By analyzing the characteristics and setting principle of civil quick adjudication, it realizes the necessity of setting up civil quick adjudication procedure, and points out the relationship between this procedure and the simple and small amount procedure. To further clarify the rationality of the existence of the procedure; secondly, this paper reviews and analyzes the relevant provisions of the current civil speedup in the two foreign legal systems, and summarizes its characteristics and uses for reference. This paper investigates the current situation and operation of the civil quick adjudication procedure in our country. It is found that the civil quick adjudication procedure in our country has a unclear orientation in practice. There are a series of problems, such as the parties' choice of procedure to be protected, and the transition mechanism between the civil quick adjudication procedure and the non-quick adjudication procedure in our country are not perfect. This paper holds that, in order to solve the above problems, First of all, it is necessary to give a reasonable position to the civil adjudication procedure from the legislative level, and secondly, to guarantee the parties' choice of procedure from the two aspects of the scope of application and the level of trial. Finally, it is necessary to realize the scientific and efficient procedure conversion and convergence mechanism. The main purpose of this paper is to enable people to have a deeper understanding of the civil adjudication procedure in China. Improve the civil adjudication procedure to promote the efficiency of civil justice in China.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】