证据学视野下技术侦查研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 13:16

本文选题：技术侦查　切入点：证据　出处：《南京师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2012年3月《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法修正案》通过并实施,其中第二编第二章新增了“技术侦查措施”一节的规定,技术侦查在打击犯罪上具有其他侦查不可比拟性的优势,可以有效降低侦查环节的繁琐性。然而由于其获取的证据具有隐蔽性、实施主体上具有特定性、实施过程上具有严密的程序性和对获取的证据可直接被采,因此技术侦查的证据学分析必将成为理论界与实务界关注的焦点。我国目前没有完善的技术侦查的证据制度,对于技术侦查获取证据的收集、固定、质证依然存在不少问题,故将技术侦查放在证据学视野下进行研究,以此希望达到利于我国理论与司法实践的目的。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分对技术侦查及其证据进行概述。通过对技术侦查的内涵的界定,从而引出技术侦查证据的特殊性,随即从其价值与弊端两个维度对其加以阐释分析,便于初步了解技术侦查及其证据。第二部分主要从制度层面对比我国与域外国家关于技术侦查证据的规定。我国法律对于技术侦查的规定相对较晚,并且只是散见于一些法律和内部性条文规定中,而域外国家关于技术侦查的规定起步较早,相关制度规定也比较完善,由此对比可以看出我国法律关于技术侦查规定的不足,从而以此为契机探寻完善的路径。第三部分主要从实体和程序两个层面剖析技术侦查证据运用面临的困境以及原因。具体先从刑诉法修改前后技术侦查证据运用状况入手,然后分析得出技术侦查证据在实体和程序两个层面所面临的具体困境,进而挖掘出困境产生的原因究竟是什么,为下文我国技术侦查证据制度的具体完善埋下伏笔。第四部分通过前文分析提出对我国技术侦查证据制度完善的个人见解。针对前文分析关于技术侦查及其证据出现的问题,借助立法设计对技术侦查证据取证规则、认证规则以及非法证据排除规则加以有效规制,以期达到技术侦查及其证据的有效运用,最终实现侦破案件打击犯罪的目的。
[Abstract]:In March 2012, the Amendment to the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China was adopted and put into effect. In the second part, chapter II of the Amendment to the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, the provisions of the section "Technical investigation measures" have been added. The technical investigation has the incomparable advantages of other investigations in the fight against crime. It can effectively reduce the complexity of the investigation link. However, because of its hidden evidence, the specific subject of the implementation, the strict procedure of the implementation process and the direct collection of the obtained evidence, Therefore, the evidential analysis of technical investigation will become the focus of attention in theory and practice. There is no perfect evidence system of technical investigation in our country, and there are still many problems in collecting, fixing and cross-examination of evidence obtained by technical investigation. Therefore, the technical investigation should be studied from the perspective of evidential science. This article is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the technical investigation and its evidence. Thus, the particularity of technical investigation evidence is induced, and then it is explained and analyzed from its value and malpractice. The second part mainly compares the provisions on technical investigation evidence between China and foreign countries from the system level. The provisions of Chinese law on technical investigation are relatively late. And only scattered in some laws and provisions of internal provisions, while the provisions of foreign countries on technical investigation started earlier, the relevant system provisions are relatively perfect, from which we can see the deficiencies of our laws on technical investigation provisions. The third part mainly analyzes the difficulties and reasons of the application of technical investigation evidence from the two aspects of entity and procedure, and starts with the situation of the use of technical investigation evidence before and after the revision of the Criminal procedure Law. Then it analyzes the concrete predicament that the technical investigation evidence faces at the two levels of entity and procedure, and then excavates the reason of the dilemma. Part 4th, through the previous analysis, puts forward personal opinions on the perfection of the evidence system of technical investigation in China. In the light of the previous analysis, the problems concerning technical investigation and the emergence of evidence are analyzed. With the help of legislative design, the rules of evidence collection, authentication and exclusion of illegal evidence are effectively regulated, in order to achieve the effective use of technical investigation and evidence, and finally to achieve the purpose of cracking down on crime.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】