法官权力监督制约机制研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 21:07

本文选题：法官权力监督与制约　切入点：依法独立行使审判权　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法是维护社会公平正义的最后一道防线,如果司法这道防线缺乏公信力,社会公正就会受到普遍质疑,社会和谐稳定就难以保障。在司法领域中,树立司法公信力固然需要司法权依法独立行使,但是对法官权力的监督与制约同样也是实现司法公正的应有之义。党的十八届四中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》提到:“加强对司法活动的监督,努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平正义。”明确监督制约对司法公信力的重要意义。本文认为,构建我国法官权力的监督制约机制的核心问题在于既能实现有效的监督,同时不可损抑司法权的独立性。一个完善的、良性运转的法官的权力监督与制约机制应该是保障司法权依法独立行使的重要条件。为此,本文通过三个部分就行论证。首先,对权力监督制约从社会主义权力运行过程、司法腐败、司法权依法独立行使以及树立司法权威的角度进行必要性分析。然后从权力的构成要素角度对监督制约机制的几种主要模式进行梳理。在第二部分,通过比照美国、德国及我国台湾地区的法官权力监督制约机制,分析其中对于法官权力监督制约机制的制度建构,归纳域外已有的模式及经验。在最后一章中,梳理我国现有的法官权力监督制约机制,提炼其中存在的问题,结合域外经验与我国的国情,对我国法官权力监督与制约机制的完善提出几点建议。
[Abstract]:Justice is the last line of defense to safeguard social fairness and justice. If this line of defense lacks credibility, social justice will be universally questioned, and social harmony and stability will be difficult to guarantee. The establishment of judicial credibility, of course, requires the judicial power to be exercised independently in accordance with the law. However, the supervision and restriction of judges' power is also the proper meaning of realizing judicial justice. The "decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively promoting the Rule of Law on several important issues" adopted by the fourth Plenary session of the 18 Central Committee of the CPC Central Committee states: "Canada. Strengthening the supervision of judicial activities, Try to make the people feel fair and just in every judicial case. "clear supervision and restriction of the importance of judicial credibility. The core problem of constructing the supervision and restriction mechanism of judges' power in our country lies in that it can not only realize effective supervision, but also not impair the independence of judicial power. The supervision and restriction mechanism of judges' power should be the important condition to guarantee the independent exercise of judicial power according to law. The author analyzes the necessity of judicial corruption, the independent exercise of judicial power and the establishment of judicial authority. Then it combs several main modes of supervision and restriction mechanism from the point of view of the constituent elements of power. In the second part, by comparing with the United States, The supervision and restriction mechanism of judges' power in Germany and Taiwan is analyzed, and the system construction of judge's power supervision and restriction mechanism is analyzed, and the existing models and experiences abroad are summarized. In the last chapter, This paper combs the existing supervision and restriction mechanism of judges' power in our country, abstracts the existing problems, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the supervision and restriction mechanism of judges' power in our country in combination with the overseas experience and the national conditions of our country.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】