论民国初年行政诉讼体制的确立

发布时间：2018-03-05 18:31

本文选题：权力分立　切入点：司法审查　出处：《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：行政诉讼体制有以司法机关掌握行政审判权的司法审查体制以及以专门机关掌握行政审判权的行政裁判体制之分,其原因在于如何认识司法权与行政权的分立与制衡。民国初年法制建设过程受国外行政诉讼理论的传播,立法者的知识背景、自身利益等因素的影响,南京临时政府时期、国会制宪时期以及北洋政府统治初期均确立了各不相同的行政诉讼体制,呈现出自上而下的法制建设,制度的选择易受立法者自身偏好影响的特点。
[Abstract]:The administrative litigation system includes a judicial review system in which the judicial organs hold the administrative jurisdiction and an administrative adjudication system in which the specialized organs hold the administrative jurisdiction. The reason lies in how to understand the separation and balance of judicial power and executive power. The process of legal system construction in the early period of the Republic of China was influenced by the spread of foreign administrative litigation theory, the knowledge background of legislators, the self-interest and so on, during the period of Nanjing Provisional Government. During the constitution-making period of Congress and the early period of the Beiyang government, different administrative litigation systems were established, showing the legal construction from top to bottom, and the choice of the system was easily influenced by the preference of the legislators themselves.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部“国家法治与法学理论研究”项目重点课题“民国时期司法制度研究”(项目编号:13SFB1002)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D929;D925.3;K258

【参考文献】