指定居所监视居住的适用与规制

发布时间：2018-03-05 17:44

本文选题：指定居所监视居住　切入点：刑事诉讼法　出处：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2012年3月，第十一届全国人民代表大会对《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》进行了第二次修改，，监视居住强制措施部分也有了大幅修改，特别是增加了指定居所监视居住措施，成为我国司法改革的又一亮点。修法之前的司法实践中，监视居住强制措施的适用率偏低，在适用过程中又出现变相羁押嫌疑人、被告人等诸多弊端，所以多年来法学界对监视居住制度一直存在着“改造论”与“废除论”两种对立的观点。新《刑事诉讼法》的修改采纳了“改造论”的观点，在监视居住的适用范围、适用条件与适用方式等方面进行了详细的规定，并增加了指定居所监视居住。这一新的规定也引起了社会各界广泛关注。为保障犯罪嫌疑人的人权，有效防止侦查机关滥用公权力，本文在考察新刑诉法修订实施为背景的基础上，对指定居所监视居住的适用条件、执行场所与执行方法、如何保障被指定居所监视居住犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权益，以及人民检察院如何对指定居所监视居住进行监督等问题进行了深入研究，探求在司法实践中既能实现指定居所监视居住的法定功能，又防止将其异化为羁押措施。希望通过本研究明析指定监视居住制度存在的不足之处以及今后进一步完善的方向。
[Abstract]:In March 2012, the eleventh session of the National People's Congress of the second amendment of the criminal procedure law of People's Republic of China < >, residential surveillance coercive measures are also part of the substantial changes, especially the increase of designated residential monitoring measures, has become another highlight of the judicial reform in our country. The judicial practice law before, the applicable rate of compulsory measures residential surveillance is low, and the emergence of disguised suspects in the application process, the defendant and other defects, so for many years the jurisprudence of the residential surveillance system has been the existence of "transformation theory" and "the abolition of the" two opposing points of view. The new "criminal procedural law > Modify adopted" transformation "theory point of view and in the scope of residential surveillance, the applicable conditions and applicable methods in detail, and an increase in the designated residence under surveillance. This new rule has also aroused the Attention. For the protection of the rights of criminal suspects, effectively prevent the investigation organs abuse of public power, based on the investigation of the new criminal procedure law for the implementation of the revised on the basis of the background of the specified conditions for residence under surveillance, the implementation of the place and the implementation method, how to guarantee the assigned residence under surveillance of criminal suspects, the legitimate interests of the defendant. The people's Procuratorate, and conducts an in-depth study on the problem of how to specify the residential monitoring supervision, explore in judicial practice can not only realize the specified legal functions of residence under surveillance, and prevent the alienation of custody measures. Want to specify the shortcomings of residential surveillance system as well as the future direction of further research by the analysis.

【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】