“内忧外患”中的审判公开——主要从刑事诉讼的视角分析

发布时间：2018-03-06 09:18

本文选题：信息化浪潮　切入点：审判公开　出处：《当代法学》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近年来法院在司法改革中推动审判公开,取得一定成效。但一些深层矛盾并未解决,在互联网和自媒体形成的信息化浪潮冲击以及法院公信力不足的情况下,法院对审判公开呈现出选择性倾向,审判信息的实质性公开不足。为此,应当认识审判公开是法院的法律义务而非特权,公信力的缺失不能归咎于媒体与社会,法院应当维护其司法理性。因此,要采取措施促使已有审判公开制度全面落实;要推进审判改革,抑制审判信息"内卷化",扩大审判公开范围;要将审判公开与司法宣传适当切割,倚重法定方式、法定程序实现审判信息公开,同时尊重民众对司法的"异议权"。舆情控制和危机应对要理性、守法,不能打破审判公开的基本原则。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the court in the judicial reform to promote open trial, and achieved certain results. But some deep contradiction has not been resolved, in the Internet and information technology from the media form and the impact of the credibility of the court under the court of public trial showed selective tendency, substantial judicial information disclosure deficiencies. Therefore, we should know the public trial is the court's legal obligations rather than privileges, lack of credibility cannot be attributed to the media and society, the court shall maintain its judicial rationality. Therefore, measures should be taken to promote the full implementation of the open trial system; to promote judicial reform, restrain the trial information "Involution", expand the scope of the disclosure to the public trial and trial; judicial publicity right cutting, rely on legal means, legal procedures to achieve judicial information disclosure, while respecting the people of justice "right of dissent". Public opinion control and crisis response to Rational and law-abiding can not break the basic principles of the open trial.

【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2;D925.2

【参考文献】