我国民事非讼程序研究

发布时间：2018-03-06 11:02

本文选题：民事诉讼　切入点：非讼案件　出处：《海南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在大陆法系民事诉讼程序制度中,根据案件本质、特点的不同,把案件分为诉讼案件和非讼案件,以诉讼案件和非讼案件为对象就有了相应的不同的审理程序。在我国现行《民事诉讼法》中没有区分诉讼案件与非讼案件,也没有以非讼案件为对象的民事非讼程序概念。但是,我国《民事诉讼法》中规定的特别程序的审理对象实质上已经具备了非讼案件的本质,特别程序也就是实质意义上的民事非讼程序。目前已有一些学者对民事非讼程序有一定的研究,但是对民事非讼程序在民事司法领域中的角色和地位以及对民事非讼程序相关程序规则的立法的完善还是有所欠缺。文章从民事非讼程序的审理对象非讼案件切入,概述了民事非讼程序的基本理论。在深入探讨了非讼案件的本质和特征的基础上,阐述了民事非讼程序与诉讼程序、特别程序及非诉讼程序的区别。为了对民事非讼程序有更全面、客观的理解,考察了德国、日本、法国和俄国四国的民事非讼程序,通过考察得到了应当要完善我国民事非讼程序的程序规则、扩展我国民事非讼程序的调整范围、运用多元程序体现不同的程序价值以及保持我国民事非讼程序的开放性这几点启示。在通过对我国民事非讼程序现状的分析中总结出我国民事非讼程序存在着价值定位不明确、立法规定不科学、适用范围较狭窄、救济途径不完善等问题。依据对我国民事非讼程序存在问题的原因的分析,建议要明确我国民事非讼程序的地位和价值,完善我国民事非讼程序的立法规定,强化我国民事非讼程序的功能,健全我国民事非讼程序向诉讼程序转换的机制,完善我国民事非讼程序的救济途径。
[Abstract]:In the civil procedure system of civil law system, cases are divided into litigation cases and non-litigation cases according to the nature and characteristics of the cases. Taking litigation cases and non-litigation cases as the objects, there are corresponding different trial procedures. There is no distinction between litigation cases and non-litigation cases in the current Civil procedure Law of China. There is also no concept of civil non-litigation procedure for non-contentious cases. However, the object of special procedures stipulated in our country's Civil procedure Law has in essence possessed the essence of non-contentious cases. The special procedure is also the civil non-litigation procedure in the essence. At present, some scholars have studied the civil non-litigation procedure to a certain extent. However, the role and status of civil non-litigation proceedings in the field of civil justice and the perfection of the relevant procedural rules of civil non-litigation proceedings are still lacking. This paper summarizes the basic theory of civil non-contentious procedure, and on the basis of deeply discussing the essence and characteristics of non-contentious case, expounds the civil non-contentious procedure and litigation procedure. In order to have a more comprehensive and objective understanding of civil non-litigation proceedings, we examined civil non-litigation proceedings in Germany, Japan, France and Russia. Through investigation, we have obtained that we should perfect the procedural rules of civil non-litigation proceedings in our country, and expand the adjustment scope of civil non-litigation proceedings in our country. By using multiple procedures to reflect different procedural values and to maintain the openness of civil non-litigation proceedings in China, the author concludes that the value orientation of civil non-litigation proceedings in China is not clear through the analysis of the present situation of civil non-litigation proceedings in China. The legislative provisions are not scientific, the scope of application is relatively narrow, the remedy channel is not perfect and so on. Based on the analysis of the causes of the problems existing in the civil non-litigation procedure in China, it is suggested that the status and value of the civil non-litigation procedure in our country should be clarified. The legislative provisions of civil non-litigation procedure in China should be perfected, the function of civil non-litigation procedure should be strengthened, the mechanism of transforming civil non-litigation procedure into litigation procedure should be perfected, and the relief ways of civil non-litigation procedure in China should be perfected.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】