政府信息公开诉讼研究

发布时间：2018-03-06 11:34

本文选题：政府信息　切入点：信息公开行为　出处：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：政府信息公开诉讼对于建设透明政府、防止权利腐败以及保障公民的知情权具有重要意义。政府信息公开诉讼作为一种新型诉讼,其在案件受理、证据规则、案件审理、司法认定等方面均与传统的行政诉讼不同,具有一定的特殊性。然而,我国目前的政府信息公开诉讼制度还处于起步阶段,相关的法律法规也不够完善,进而使得政府信息公开诉讼并没有起到对政府信息公开所应有的“倒逼”作用。为此,本文从对政府信息公开诉讼的相关理论出发,对我国政府信息公开诉讼的基础理论和现状进行了梳理和分析,并结合相关典型案例,对我国政府信息公开诉讼的司法实践进行了剖析,从政府信息公开诉讼的微观角度提出了自己的建议。具体而言,本文分为以下几个部分：第一部分,为本文的第一章,从宏观层面着手,详细论述了“政府信息公开诉讼的一般原理”。首先,厘清了政府信息的内涵,探讨了政府信息公开的范围及方式,分析了政府信息公开的意义。其次,研究了政府信息公开行为的可诉性,并探究了政府信息公开诉讼对于保障民众知情权以及促进行政诉讼制度的现代化的基本功能。最后,讨论了政府信息公开诉讼与行政复议两种救济模式的配置。第二部分,为本文的第二章到第五章,从微观角度出发,分别针对政府信息公开诉讼审理过程中的受案范围、当事人和举证责任这三个重要方面展开了相关研究,同时对司法认定这一重要内容进行了探讨。首先,分析了我国政府信息公开诉讼中受案范围过于狭窄的原因,并就扩大受案范围的难点进行了深入研究并提出了相应的完善措施。其次,针对政府信息公开诉讼中当事人资格认定难的问题,剖析了我国在原告和被告资格认定方面存在的瑕疵,并在此基础上对“扩大原告范围”以及“被告资格认定中的难点”提出了相关建议。再次,研究了双方当事人举证责任分配的特殊规则,并对被告举证责任和原告举证责任分别进行了优化。最后,针对我国目前缺乏对例外信息的具体认定方法的现状,详细论述了例外信息的认定方法,并从微观层面上讨论了例外信息的具体认定。
[Abstract]:The public litigation of government information is of great significance to the construction of transparent government, the prevention of corruption of rights and the protection of citizens' right to know. As a new type of litigation, the public litigation of government information is accepted in cases, rules of evidence, and cases are tried. Judicial determination is different from the traditional administrative litigation, and has some particularity. However, the current litigation system of government information disclosure in our country is still in its infancy, and the relevant laws and regulations are not perfect enough. Thus, the government information disclosure litigation does not play the role of "overturning" the government information disclosure. Therefore, this paper proceeds from the relevant theory of the government information disclosure litigation. This paper analyzes the basic theory and present situation of the public litigation of government information in China, and analyzes the judicial practice of the public litigation of government information in our country in the light of the relevant typical cases. From the micro point of view of government information disclosure litigation, this paper puts forward its own suggestions. Specifically, this paper is divided into the following parts:. The first part, as the first chapter of this paper, discusses in detail the "general principle of government information disclosure litigation" from the macro level. Firstly, it clarifies the connotation of government information, and probes into the scope and method of government information disclosure. This paper analyzes the significance of government information disclosure. Secondly, it studies the actionable nature of government information disclosure, and probes into the basic function of government information disclosure litigation to protect the public's right to know and to promote the modernization of administrative litigation system. This paper discusses the allocation of two relief modes: government information publicity litigation and administrative reconsideration. The second part, from the second chapter to the 5th chapter, from the microscopic point of view, from the perspective of the public government information litigation process in the case of the scope of the case, the parties and the burden of proof of these three important aspects of the relevant research. At the same time, it discusses the important content of judicial cognizance. Firstly, it analyzes the reasons for the narrow scope of the cases in the public information litigation of our government. It also makes a thorough study on the difficulties of expanding the scope of accepting cases and puts forward the corresponding improvement measures. Secondly, aiming at the difficulty of determining the qualification of the parties in the public government information litigation, This paper analyzes the defects in the qualification of the plaintiff and the defendant in China, and on this basis puts forward some relevant suggestions on "enlarging the scope of the plaintiff" and "the difficulty in the determination of the defendant's qualification". This paper studies the special rules of the distribution of the burden of proof of both parties, and optimizes the burden of proof of the defendant and the plaintiff respectively. The identification method of exception information is discussed in detail, and the concrete identification of exception information is discussed from micro level.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】